Pins and Rubbers Traction System for Treatment of Intraarticular Fractures of Distal Interphalangeal Joint.
Аннотация
Background
The pins and rubber traction system (PRTS) has proven effective in managing intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. However, there is scant evidence in the literature regarding its efficacy in treating distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ). This study aims to investigate the outcomes of PRTS in the treatment of comminuted intra-articular fractures of the DIPJ.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of patients with comminuted intra-articular fractures of the DIPJ treated with PRTS between 2017 and 2021. At the final follow-up, we measured and compared the active range of motion (ROM) in both affected and non-injured contralateral fingers. The subjective evaluation utilised the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) questionnaire and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Results
Ten patients with a mean follow-up of 13.2 months (range: 12-17) were included in the study. Fracture locations included the base of the distal phalanx in two patients, the condyle of the middle phalanx in seven and both in one patient. At the final follow-up, the average VAS score was 0.5 (range: 0-2). The average active motion of the DIPJ was 61° (range: 50°-70°) for the injured side and 76° (range: 75°-80°) for the opposite side. The mean range of DIPJ movement was 80% (range: 68%-87%) of the non-injured side. Extension deficits were observed in five patients, with a median deficit value of 10° (range: 5°-10°). The average Quick-DASH score was 2.9 (range: 0-11.3).
Conclusions
The PRTS can be considered as an effective surgical technique in managing comminuted intra-articular fractures of the DIPJ. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.