MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4097/kja.251033

Медицинская библиотека · Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026

Severe bradycardia in a child with an implanted vagus nerve stimulator undergoing laparoscopy -A case report.

Rebollar Ramón Eizaga, Muñoz Quintero José Manuel, López Alfaro Rafael Eduardo

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Vagus nerve stimulation is an established therapeutic option for children with drug-resistant epilepsy who do not respond to other treatments. During surgical procedures, this therapy has various anesthetic implications and may result in critical respiratory and cardiac complications.

CASE: We report the case of a 13-year-old child with an implanted vagus nerve stimulator who underwent laparoscopy-assisted gastrostomy tube placement under general anesthesia with the device activated. A severe episode of bradycardia occurred during pneumoperitoneum, which was successfully managed pharmacologically, without external device deactivation. The rationale for this management decision is discussed and reflections based on the clinical course are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative management of vagus nerve stimulators must be individualized. Maintaining device activation may be reasonable in children with recent seizure activity, whereas temporary deactivation may be considered during procedures associated with a high risk of vagal reflex. However, in cases requiring immediate deactivation, pharmacological intervention may be necessary given the deactivation magnet latency.

Для цитирования: Rebollar Ramón Eizaga, Muñoz Quintero José Manuel, López Alfaro Rafael Eduardo. Severe bradycardia in a child with an implanted vagus nerve stimulator undergoing laparoscopy -A case report.. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2026. DOI: 10.4097/kja.251033.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.