JBJS reviews · 2021
Volar Locking Plate Fixation Versus Closed Reduction for Distal Radial Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lawson Andrew, Na Michael, Naylor Justine M, Lewin Adriane M, Harris Ian A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Distal radial fractures in adults are common, representing a substantial burden to patients and health systems. The 2 main treatments are closed reduction and cast immobilization (CR) and volar locking plate (VLP) fixation. Our primary aim was to determine if VLP fixation leads to better patient-reported pain and function at 12 months compared with CR.
METHODS: We searched systematically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of VLP fixation with CR for the treatment of distal radial fractures in adults. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of each study. Meta-analyses of patient-reported outcomes, clinical outcomes, and complications were performed. Key findings were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
RESULTS: A total of 8 RCTs (810 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Based on moderate-certainty evidence, no clinically important differences in patient-reported pain and function were found: although the mean difference (MD) in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 12 months was 4.1 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 7.0 points) in favor of VLP fixation, this was well below the minimum clinically important difference of 10 points. There was low-certainty evidence that VLP fixation led to better Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores at 12 months (MD, 6.9 points; 95% CI, -0.6 to 14.3 points) and better DASH scores at 24 months (MD, 8.9 points; 95% CI, 5.8 to 12.1 points) but again, these differences were not clinically important. There was very low or low-certainty evidence that VLP fixation provided better long-term radiographic outcomes, including palmar tilt (MD, 6.5°; 95% CI, 2.8° to 10.1°), radial inclination (MD, 3.4°; 95% CI, 2.5° to 4.3°), and ulnar variance (MD, 0.7 mm; 95% CI, -0.8 to 2.1 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no clinically important differences between treatments with respect to patient-reported pain and function at 12 months post-treatment, even though VLP fixation resulted in better fracture alignment than CR.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
METHODS: We searched systematically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of VLP fixation with CR for the treatment of distal radial fractures in adults. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of each study. Meta-analyses of patient-reported outcomes, clinical outcomes, and complications were performed. Key findings were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
RESULTS: A total of 8 RCTs (810 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Based on moderate-certainty evidence, no clinically important differences in patient-reported pain and function were found: although the mean difference (MD) in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 12 months was 4.1 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 7.0 points) in favor of VLP fixation, this was well below the minimum clinically important difference of 10 points. There was low-certainty evidence that VLP fixation led to better Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores at 12 months (MD, 6.9 points; 95% CI, -0.6 to 14.3 points) and better DASH scores at 24 months (MD, 8.9 points; 95% CI, 5.8 to 12.1 points) but again, these differences were not clinically important. There was very low or low-certainty evidence that VLP fixation provided better long-term radiographic outcomes, including palmar tilt (MD, 6.5°; 95% CI, 2.8° to 10.1°), radial inclination (MD, 3.4°; 95% CI, 2.5° to 4.3°), and ulnar variance (MD, 0.7 mm; 95% CI, -0.8 to 2.1 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no clinically important differences between treatments with respect to patient-reported pain and function at 12 months post-treatment, even though VLP fixation resulted in better fracture alignment than CR.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.