Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015
Clinical and imaging findings in a rare case of sinus pericranii.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bouali Sofiene, Maamri Kais, Abderrahmen Khansa, Asma Bouhoula, Boubaker Adnen, Hafedh Jemel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sinus pericranii is a rare, usually asymptomatic condition that is characterized by an abnormal communication between the intra- and extracranial venous drainage pathways. The etiology is unknown but both congenital and post-traumatic etiologies have been proposed. Treatment is primarily surgical but newer minimally invasive endovascular approaches have been reported and is indicated due to cosmesis, hemorrhage, and air embolism.
ILLUSTRATIVE CASE: We present a case of an 11-month-old boy having sinus pericranii, who was referred for a slowly growing tumor located frontally in the midline on his scalp since 6 months of age. CT-scan with three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) reconstruction and magnetic resonance imaging along with venography was performed which confirmed the diagnosis. Simple surveillance was decided because of a limited esthetic prejudice and the absence of any functional disorder.
CONCLUSION: The prognosis is nearly always good with a low risk of bleeding. A simple follow-up is often proposed because of the usual absence of complications.
ILLUSTRATIVE CASE: We present a case of an 11-month-old boy having sinus pericranii, who was referred for a slowly growing tumor located frontally in the midline on his scalp since 6 months of age. CT-scan with three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) reconstruction and magnetic resonance imaging along with venography was performed which confirmed the diagnosis. Simple surveillance was decided because of a limited esthetic prejudice and the absence of any functional disorder.
CONCLUSION: The prognosis is nearly always good with a low risk of bleeding. A simple follow-up is often proposed because of the usual absence of complications.