Neurourology and urodynamics · 2020
In utero myelomeningocele repair: The natural history of patients with incontinent pattern (sphincteric deficiency: leakage below 40 CMH20).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Macedo Antonio, Di Migueli Ricardo Del Debbio, Cavalheiro Sérgio, Moron Antonio, da Cruz Marcela Leal
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Since 2011 we have been following prospectively myelomeningocele patients treated in utero with particular interest to patients with sphincter weakness/deficiency. We investigated the changes of bladder pattern and upper urinary tract with time in children who underwent in utero repair and had low-pressure incontinence based on urodynamic evaluation (UE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the 120 patients in our database, 117 had at least one UE. Of these, 30 were classified as incontinent when leaking at low pressure (<40 cmH20). We reviewed clinical evaluation, urinary tract ultrasound, voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), and other UE parameters at first and last evaluation.
RESULTS: We found 30 cases (25.64%). Mean age at initial evaluation was 4.97 months followed by UE done initially at mean age of 5.73 months. Follow-up was 28.4 months. Febrile urinary tract infection has been found in four patients (13.3%), hydronephrosis in four patients, and bladder neck thickening in three (10%). The VCUG showed vesicoureteral reflux in three cases (3/27, 11.1%). A total of 90% of patients had detrusor overactivity with mean maximum detrusor pressure (33.37 cmH20). Only 16.67% of patients showed normal bladder capacity. From the 30 patients, 23 had at least two UE. We noticed a change of bladder pattern as follows: six patients became of high-risk pattern, five normal, and two with underactive bladder pattern. The average interval between the first and last UE was 25.5 months (median: 15 months).
CONCLUSION: We concluded that 43.47% of patients with low DLPP have kept the incontinent pattern. If the initial LPP was below 30 cmH20, 70% remained with the incontinet pattern.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the 120 patients in our database, 117 had at least one UE. Of these, 30 were classified as incontinent when leaking at low pressure (<40 cmH20). We reviewed clinical evaluation, urinary tract ultrasound, voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), and other UE parameters at first and last evaluation.
RESULTS: We found 30 cases (25.64%). Mean age at initial evaluation was 4.97 months followed by UE done initially at mean age of 5.73 months. Follow-up was 28.4 months. Febrile urinary tract infection has been found in four patients (13.3%), hydronephrosis in four patients, and bladder neck thickening in three (10%). The VCUG showed vesicoureteral reflux in three cases (3/27, 11.1%). A total of 90% of patients had detrusor overactivity with mean maximum detrusor pressure (33.37 cmH20). Only 16.67% of patients showed normal bladder capacity. From the 30 patients, 23 had at least two UE. We noticed a change of bladder pattern as follows: six patients became of high-risk pattern, five normal, and two with underactive bladder pattern. The average interval between the first and last UE was 25.5 months (median: 15 months).
CONCLUSION: We concluded that 43.47% of patients with low DLPP have kept the incontinent pattern. If the initial LPP was below 30 cmH20, 70% remained with the incontinet pattern.