MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00247-022-05463-y

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric radiology · 2022

Urinary excretion of low-osmolar contrast media during small-bowel follow-through studies in infants is not definitive evidence of bowel perforation.

Karmazyn Boaz, Wanner Matthew R, Bhatia Manisha, Jennings S Gregory, Billmire Deborah F

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Presence of contrast agent in the urinary system in infants after small-bowel follow-through study with low-osmolar contrast media has been described as a sign of bowel perforation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how often the presence of contrast agent in the bladder after small-bowel follow-through is a reliable sign of bowel perforation or necrosis.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

From the radiology information system, we retrieved imaging reports of infants evaluated with small-bowel follow-through and findings of contrast agent in the bladder. We retrieved demographic and clinical information from the medical records. Presence of bladder contrast medium was considered true-positive evidence of bowel perforation or necrosis if confirmed by pneumoperitoneum, extraluminal contrast agent, surgery or pathology within 3 days of the small-bowel follow-through. False-positives for bowel perforation or necrosis were based on surgical findings or clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 207 infants who had small-bowel follow-through, 18 infants (12 boys; mean age 50 days, range 14 days to 8.5 months) had contrast medium in the bladder after the small-bowel follow-through. Fifteen of the 18 (83.3%) had a history of prematurity and 11 had prior abdominal surgery. Four of the 18 (22.2%) had bowel perforation or necrosis at surgery or pathology performed more than 3 days after the small-bowel follow-through and were considered indeterminate and excluded. Eight of the remaining 14 infants (57.1%) had bowel perforation or necrosis based on surgical evidence of perforation or pathology confirmation of necrosis (n=6), pneumoperitoneum (n=1) or contrast agent leakage from enterocutaneous fistula (n=1). Six of the 14 (42.9%) were false-positives, without evidence of bowel perforation or necrosis based on clinical follow-up (n=4) or surgery (n=2).

CONCLUSION

Demonstration of urinary contrast agent post small-bowel follow-through with low-osmolar contrast medium in newborns/infants with complex medical problems is not a definitive indication of bowel perforation or necrosis. More than one-third of our patients with contrast medium in the bladder did not have bowel perforation or necrosis.

Для цитирования: Karmazyn Boaz, Wanner Matthew R, Bhatia Manisha, Jennings S Gregory, Billmire Deborah F. Urinary excretion of low-osmolar contrast media during small-bowel follow-through studies in infants is not definitive evidence of bowel perforation.. Pediatric radiology. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05463-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.