MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00004728-199707000-00022

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of computer assisted tomography · 1997

Spiral CT in the evaluation of flank pain: overall accuracy and feature analysis.

Fielding J R, Fox L A, Heller H, Seltzer S E, Tempany C M, Silverman S G, Steele G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Our goal was to assess test reliability and identify those features that have the strongest positive and negative predictive values in the diagnosis of renal colic using spiral CT.

METHOD: Fifty non-contrast-enhanced CT scans (5 mm slice thickness) obtained in patients presenting with flank pain were reviewed by three radiologists blinded to the final diagnoses. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for nine pertinent findings were determined as compared to clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cases had findings of ureteral obstruction. Findings with the strongest positive predictive values (> 0.90) were ureteral stone, hydronephrosis, hydroureter, periureteral stranding, and ureterovesical junction edema. Findings with the strongest negative predictive values (> 0.89) were absence of hydronephrosis and hydroureter. The areas under the receiver operating curves for Readers 1, 2, and 3 were 0.970 +/- 0.030, 0.942 +/- 0.036, and 0.982 +/- 0.020.

CONCLUSION

Absence of hydroureter and hydronephrosis on spiral CT images should prompt a search for a diagnosis other than an obstructing ureteral stone.

Для цитирования: Fielding J R, Fox L A, Heller H, Seltzer S E, Tempany C M, Silverman S G, Steele G. Spiral CT in the evaluation of flank pain: overall accuracy and feature analysis.. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 1997. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199707000-00022.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.