The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) drug combinations: insights from a pharmacometric simulation study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
O'Jeanson Amaury, Nielsen Elisabet I, Friberg Lena E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The emergence of β-lactamase-producing bacteria has led to the use of β-lactam (BL) antibiotic and β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) drug combinations. Despite therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) being endorsed for BLs, the impact of TDM on BLIs remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate whether BLIs are available in effective exposures at the site of infection and assess if TDM of BLIs could be of interest.
METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic models for 9 BL and BLI compounds were used to simulate drug concentrations at infection sites following EMA-approved dose regimens, considering plasma protein binding and tissue penetration. Predicted target site concentrations were used for probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis.
RESULTS: Using EUCAST targets, satisfactory (≥90%) PTA was observed for BLs in patients with typical renal clearance (CrCL of 80 mL/min) across various sites of infection. However, results varied for BLIs. Avibactam achieved satisfactory PTA only in plasma, with reduced PTAs in abdomen (78%), lung (73%) and prostate (23%). Similarly, tazobactam resulted in unsatisfactory PTAs in intra-abdominal infections (79%), urinary tract infections (64%) and prostatitis (34%). Imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam achieved overall satisfactory PTAs, except in prostatitis and high-MIC infections for the latter combination.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the risk of solely relying on TDM of BLs, as this can indicate acceptable exposures of the BL while the BLI concentration, and consequently the combination, can result in suboptimal performance in terms of bacterial killing. Thus, dose adjustments also based on plasma concentration measurements of BLIs, in particular for avibactam and tazobactam, can be valuable in clinical practice to obtain effective exposures at the target site.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate whether BLIs are available in effective exposures at the site of infection and assess if TDM of BLIs could be of interest.
METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic models for 9 BL and BLI compounds were used to simulate drug concentrations at infection sites following EMA-approved dose regimens, considering plasma protein binding and tissue penetration. Predicted target site concentrations were used for probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis.
RESULTS: Using EUCAST targets, satisfactory (≥90%) PTA was observed for BLs in patients with typical renal clearance (CrCL of 80 mL/min) across various sites of infection. However, results varied for BLIs. Avibactam achieved satisfactory PTA only in plasma, with reduced PTAs in abdomen (78%), lung (73%) and prostate (23%). Similarly, tazobactam resulted in unsatisfactory PTAs in intra-abdominal infections (79%), urinary tract infections (64%) and prostatitis (34%). Imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam achieved overall satisfactory PTAs, except in prostatitis and high-MIC infections for the latter combination.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the risk of solely relying on TDM of BLs, as this can indicate acceptable exposures of the BL while the BLI concentration, and consequently the combination, can result in suboptimal performance in terms of bacterial killing. Thus, dose adjustments also based on plasma concentration measurements of BLIs, in particular for avibactam and tazobactam, can be valuable in clinical practice to obtain effective exposures at the target site.