Pregnancy hypertension · 2026
Prediction of term preeclampsia using angiogenic biomarkers at 24-29 weeks gestation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Björkman Stina, Bladh Marie, Bergstrand Sara, Sederholm Lawesson Sofia, Aardal Elisabeth, Overgaard Martin, Lilliecreutz Caroline
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate sFlt-1, PlGF and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at gestational weeks (GW) 24-29 for predicting hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, especially term preeclampsia, in a general Swedish population.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective nested case-control study, using samples from a pregnancy biobank.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the analysis of Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves for sFlt-1, PlGF and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, along with cut-offs, sensitivity (including at a fixed false positive rate of 20%) and specificity values and overall efficiency for predicting term preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes included data for predicting preterm preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Subgroup analyses were performed based on risk factors for preeclampsia.
RESULTS: PlGF levels were reduced, and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was increased at GW 24-29 in women who developed term preeclampsia compared to controls. ROC analysis for predicting term preeclampsia using sFlt-1, PlGF and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio resulted in areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.49, 0.76, and 0.70, respectively. The predictive accuracy improved for preterm PE, with the corresponding AUCs of 0.58, 0.91 and 0.86. Subgroup analyses of nulliparous individuals with obesity and elevated blood pressure in early pregnancy increased the AUC (0.93) for predicting term preeclampsia using PlGF.
CONCLUSIONS: PlGF alone demonstrated superior predictive performance to sFlt-1 and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio. Enhanced predictive accuracy was observed in individuals with risk factors for preeclampsia. Hence, measuring PlGF at GW 24-29 in women attending antenatal care could help to identify women at risk of developing term PE, thereby enabling more targeted resource allocation within antenatal care.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective nested case-control study, using samples from a pregnancy biobank.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the analysis of Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves for sFlt-1, PlGF and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, along with cut-offs, sensitivity (including at a fixed false positive rate of 20%) and specificity values and overall efficiency for predicting term preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes included data for predicting preterm preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Subgroup analyses were performed based on risk factors for preeclampsia.
RESULTS: PlGF levels were reduced, and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was increased at GW 24-29 in women who developed term preeclampsia compared to controls. ROC analysis for predicting term preeclampsia using sFlt-1, PlGF and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio resulted in areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.49, 0.76, and 0.70, respectively. The predictive accuracy improved for preterm PE, with the corresponding AUCs of 0.58, 0.91 and 0.86. Subgroup analyses of nulliparous individuals with obesity and elevated blood pressure in early pregnancy increased the AUC (0.93) for predicting term preeclampsia using PlGF.
CONCLUSIONS: PlGF alone demonstrated superior predictive performance to sFlt-1 and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio. Enhanced predictive accuracy was observed in individuals with risk factors for preeclampsia. Hence, measuring PlGF at GW 24-29 in women attending antenatal care could help to identify women at risk of developing term PE, thereby enabling more targeted resource allocation within antenatal care.