MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0952-8180(03)00088-6

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2003

Proficiency in interscalene anesthesia-how many blocks are necessary?

Rosenblatt Meg A, Fishkind Debbie

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To determine the number of interscalene blocks that are necessary for a resident in anesthesiology to complete so as to achieve autonomous success with that specific block.

DESIGN

Survey questionnaire of all CA1 and CA2 residents in the Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine.

SETTING

University hospital.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Seventeen CA-1 and CA-2 residents reported their experiences in performing interscalene blocks over an 8-month period. Data were collected regarding the number of previous attempts, technique, attending supervisor, patient weight, level of autonomy in the performance of the current block, and adequacy of the block for surgery. Eighty-two blocks were performed (1 to >15 per resident), supervised by 7 attending physicians, and 96.3% of blocks were reported as adequate for surgery. With an experience of seven to nine previous blocks, only 50% of residents were able to perform an interscalene block autonomously, whereas with >15 blocks, 87.5% reported autonomous success.

CONCLUSIONS

Experience with only 40 unspecified peripheral nerve blocks, as currently required by the Residency Review Committee as of January 2001, may not provide adequate opportunity for an individual to develop expertise in regional anesthesia.

Для цитирования: Rosenblatt Meg A, Fishkind Debbie. Proficiency in interscalene anesthesia-how many blocks are necessary?. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(03)00088-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.