DOI 10.2174/0113862073377616250404101442
Unlocking the Potential of Ketamine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of its Safety and Efficacy in Acute Pain Management.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Effective acute pain management in emergency departments (ED) remains a clinical priority. Ketamine, with its analgesic properties, is being evaluated as a potential alternative to opioids due to its rapid onset and distinct mechanism of action.
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of ketamine in adult ED patients with acute pain, compared to morphine, other opioids, or placebo.
METHODS
Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ketamine with opioids or placebo were included. The primary outcome was pain reduction measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS), and adverse events were evaluated as a safety endpoint. Data were analyzed using the Review Manager software. Pain scores at 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-administration were compared between ketamine and control groups.
RESULTS
No significant differences in NRS pain scores were observed at 10 minutes [-0.46 (95% CI: -2.03, 1.10)], 30 minutes [-0.13 (95% CI: -0.62, 0.37)], or 60 minutes [-0.18 (95% CI: -0.97, 0.61)]. However, a statistically significant pain reduction was seen at 15 minutes in the ketamine group [-4.11 (95% CI: -7.91, -0.31)]. Adverse events showed no significant difference between groups [Risk Ratio: 1.20 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.55)]. High heterogeneity was noted (I² statistics).
DISCUSSION: While ketamine may offer rapid analgesia at 15 minutes, its effects at other time points are comparable to controls. Safety profiles between groups were similar.
CONCLUSION
Ketamine appears to be a safe alternative for acute pain relief in ED settings, with more RCTs needed to confirm time-specific efficacy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.