Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2026
Physicomechanical and biological properties of additively manufactured photosensitive resins for provisional crowns using affordable LCD printer.
СтатьяОценочное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Teixeira Marina de Brito, Brod Marcelo Pereira, Michelon Douver, Silva Adriana Fernandes da, Piva Evandro, Lund Rafael Guerra, Rosa Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Digital technologies and additive manufacturing are transforming restorative dentistry by enabling the production of highly customized provisional crowns using cost-effective methods.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the physicomechanical and biological properties of photosensitive resins designed for Digital Light Processing (DLP) printers when used to fabricate provisional restorations with an affordable Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) printer.
METHODOLOGY: Three resins - NextDent C&B (ND), Cosmos Temp (CT), and Prizma BioProv (PB) - were tested and compared against bis-acryl (BR) and self-cure PMMA (SA) controls. Evaluated properties included flexural strength, elastic modulus (immediate, 30, and 90 days), Knoop microhardness, radiopacity, surface roughness, water sorption, solubility, and dimensional accuracy. Biological assessment employed L929 fibroblast cell viability at 1, 7, and 14 days. Data were analyzed using One-way or Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05).
RESULTS: CT exhibited the highest flexural strength, elastic modulus, and Knoop microhardness, alongside the lowest surface roughness, water sorption, and solubility compared to all other materials. ND showed lower surface roughness than controls but higher water sorption. PB presented mechanical properties comparable to those of the controls, but with higher roughness and solubility. All 3D-printed resins exhibited low radiopacity, and, with the exception of BR, cell viability decreased significantly for all materials up to day 14.
CONCLUSION: Selected photosensitive resins processed via an affordable LCD printer showed physicomechanical performance comparable to traditional bis-acryl and PMMA resins in fabricating provisional crowns. However, the low radiopacity observed for all 3D-printed materials and the time-dependent decrease in cell viability represent limitations that warrant further investigation.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the physicomechanical and biological properties of photosensitive resins designed for Digital Light Processing (DLP) printers when used to fabricate provisional restorations with an affordable Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) printer.
METHODOLOGY: Three resins - NextDent C&B (ND), Cosmos Temp (CT), and Prizma BioProv (PB) - were tested and compared against bis-acryl (BR) and self-cure PMMA (SA) controls. Evaluated properties included flexural strength, elastic modulus (immediate, 30, and 90 days), Knoop microhardness, radiopacity, surface roughness, water sorption, solubility, and dimensional accuracy. Biological assessment employed L929 fibroblast cell viability at 1, 7, and 14 days. Data were analyzed using One-way or Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05).
RESULTS: CT exhibited the highest flexural strength, elastic modulus, and Knoop microhardness, alongside the lowest surface roughness, water sorption, and solubility compared to all other materials. ND showed lower surface roughness than controls but higher water sorption. PB presented mechanical properties comparable to those of the controls, but with higher roughness and solubility. All 3D-printed resins exhibited low radiopacity, and, with the exception of BR, cell viability decreased significantly for all materials up to day 14.
CONCLUSION: Selected photosensitive resins processed via an affordable LCD printer showed physicomechanical performance comparable to traditional bis-acryl and PMMA resins in fabricating provisional crowns. However, the low radiopacity observed for all 3D-printed materials and the time-dependent decrease in cell viability represent limitations that warrant further investigation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Materials TestingSurface PropertiesTime FactorsAnimalsCrownsElastic ModulusReproducibility of ResultsAnalysis of VarianceCell SurvivalPrinting, Three-DimensionalFlexural StrengthPolymethyl MethacrylateSolubilityHardnessReference ValuesAcrylic ResinsDental Restoration, TemporaryMiceFibroblastsStatistics, Nonparametric