Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
Predictors of echocardiographic response in the Budapest-CRT upgrade trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Merkel Eperke, Masszi Richárd, Lakatos Bálint, Hatala Robert, Veres Boglárka, Fábián Alexandra, Osztheimer István, Gellér László, Urbán Tamás, Horváth Csaba, Solomon Scott D, Kutyifa Valentina, Kovács Attila, Merkely Béla, Kosztin Annamária
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Up to 30% of patients fail to respond after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). While echocardiographic predictors of response are well described in de novo CRT, evidence in CRT upgrade populations remains limited. We investigated predictors of echocardiographic response in the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade trial cohort.
METHODS: In this randomized trial, 360 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with priorly implanted pacemaker or ICD, ≥ 20% right ventricular (RV) pacing burden, and wide-paced QRS (≥ 150 ms) were randomized to CRT-D upgrade (n = 215) or ICD upgrade (n = 145). Echocardiographic response was defined as ≥ 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 12 months.
RESULTS: Among 275 patients with paired echocardiographic data, 161 (59%) were responders. Responders had fewer HF hospitalizations (0.6% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.003), more often received mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (71% vs. 59%, p = 0.038), and showed a higher baseline RV pacing burden (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p = 0.025) than non-responders. Independent predictors of echocardiographic response were randomization to CRT-D (OR 5.57, 95% CI 2.56-12.12, p < 0.0001), greater RV pacing burden (OR 1.02 per %, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.024), non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.15-5.26, p = 0.021), and a lateral LV lead position (OR 8.79, 95% CI 1.28-60.39, p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, CRT-D upgrade significantly improved echocardiographic outcomes. Non-ischemic etiology, higher RV pacing burden, and lateral LV lead positioning were associated with greater benefit. These results underscore the importance of tailored patient selection and lead placement strategies to optimize CRT-D upgrade outcomes.
METHODS: In this randomized trial, 360 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with priorly implanted pacemaker or ICD, ≥ 20% right ventricular (RV) pacing burden, and wide-paced QRS (≥ 150 ms) were randomized to CRT-D upgrade (n = 215) or ICD upgrade (n = 145). Echocardiographic response was defined as ≥ 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 12 months.
RESULTS: Among 275 patients with paired echocardiographic data, 161 (59%) were responders. Responders had fewer HF hospitalizations (0.6% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.003), more often received mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (71% vs. 59%, p = 0.038), and showed a higher baseline RV pacing burden (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p = 0.025) than non-responders. Independent predictors of echocardiographic response were randomization to CRT-D (OR 5.57, 95% CI 2.56-12.12, p < 0.0001), greater RV pacing burden (OR 1.02 per %, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.024), non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.15-5.26, p = 0.021), and a lateral LV lead position (OR 8.79, 95% CI 1.28-60.39, p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, CRT-D upgrade significantly improved echocardiographic outcomes. Non-ischemic etiology, higher RV pacing burden, and lateral LV lead positioning were associated with greater benefit. These results underscore the importance of tailored patient selection and lead placement strategies to optimize CRT-D upgrade outcomes.