In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous left ventricular assist device recipients in cardiogenic shock hospitalizations with chronic kidney disease: A nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data on the role of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients who received percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD) as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as an adjunct treatment for cardiogenic shock (CS) management.

METHODS

Using National Inpatient Sample (2016-19), we extracted CS patients receiving pLVAD and divided them into CKD and non-CKD cohorts. Multivariate regression analysis was used for adjusted odds ratios for outcomes before and after entropy balancing (EB) and predictive margins for the probability of all-cause in-hospital mortality (ACM). ACM was also compared between CS patients who did not receive MCS.

RESULTS

In our study, 29,515 patients received pLVAD as the only MCS device in CS, and the prevalence of CKD amongst them was 9.7 %. After EB, ACM did not differ in CS with and without CKD (aOR 1.008, p = 0.953). Higher adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) were noted for length of stay (LOS) (aOR 1.68, p < 0.001) and hospitalization cost (aOR 1.365, p = 0.001) in CS with CKD. Mean LOS and hospitalization cost was significantly higher in CKD cohort before and after EB (post-EB: 17.4 days vs. 10.3 days, p < 0.001 and USD 652097 vs. 482359, p = 0.001, respectively). ACM was significantly higher in CS patients who did not receive any MCS if they had CKD (aOR 1.26, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CKD patients receiving pLVAD for CS had no difference in ACM but had higher resource utilization than those without CKD. pLVAD use was associated with a lower ACM in CKD patients when compared to patients who did not receive any MCS.