Evaluating the Role of Imaging Markers in Predicting Stroke Risk and Guiding Management after Vertebral Artery Injury: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traumatic vertebral artery injury (TVAI) is a severe consequence of head and neck trauma occurring when a disturbance to vessel wall architecture causes vessel dissection. This injury comes with a host of complications, including debilitating neurologic damage, though patients are often asymptomatic upon presentation. Still, the screening recommendations, treatment strategies, and predicted outcomes of TVAI remain largely undefined. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate the risk of life-threatening sequelae occurring secondary to vertebral artery injury to minimize patient morbidity. This study aimed to explore the Biffl grade as an imaging marker for prognosticating acute stroke risk and guide appropriate management strategies. We hypothesize that an increase in Biffl grade will directly correlate with an increase in postinjury stroke risk in a stepwise fashion.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A database of patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center with CTA-diagnosed vertebral artery injury was retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was the risk of an acute ischemic stroke event within 14 days of injury. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between Biffl grade and stroke risk while controlling for clinically significant covariables.

RESULTS

In 219 patients, the median age was 60 years. Within the acute period, 22 (10.0%) of patients with TVAI had an acute stroke. In the multivariable regression, only Biffl grade 2 (P = .01) and 4 (P = .04) were significantly associated with a higher risk of stroke. This risk did not increase in a stepwise fashion as Biffl grade increased. The predicted probability of a stroke event exceeds 20% for Biffl grade 2 and 5 injuries, and the probability of stroke decreases in patients managed with antithrombotic medication regardless of injury severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of postinjury ischemic stroke does not consistently correlate with injury severity as assessed per the Biffl grade. Thus, Biffl grading alone is likely not an adequate prognostic factor to predict the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with TVAI or for guiding optimal treatment for such patients with increased risk for stroke.