Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy in transvenous lead extraction of leads with dwell time of ≥10 years.

BACKGROUND

Lead dwell time (DT) is associated with increased complexity of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) extraction. Optimal strategies for risk mitigation are not well studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the role of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in the extraction of leads with a DT of ≥10 years.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent CIED extraction since 2020 with at least 1 lead with a DT of ≥10 years. Primary outcomes were the number of tools used for each patient, clinical success, and fluoroscopy time. Secondary outcomes included laser application time, major complications, and postprocedure lead function outcomes for retained functional leads.

RESULTS

There were 33 IVL and 91 control patients in the cohort. There was no significant difference in locking stylet, laser sheath, and mechanical sheath use. Fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in the patients receiving IVL than conventional extraction patients (median 26.7 minutes [16.3 minutes, 44.4 minutes] [n = 91] [control] vs median 39.3 minutes [33.1 minutes, 53.7 minutes] [n = 33] [IVL]; P = .002). 2 patients who received IVL and 3 control patients had major complications; all had lead-related significant venous occlusion. 5 patients who underwent IVL retained functional leads, which demonstrated stable function after the procedure at a median follow-up of 1.25 years [1.24 years, 1.44 years].

CONCLUSION

IVL did not improve procedural efficiency or complexity in our cohort. Partial venous occlusion may represent a risk factor for cardiovascular injury. Further studies of specific patient cohorts, such as those with imaging-proven, lead-associated calcified adhesions, may help define the benefit of IVL in CIED extraction.