DOI 10.1097/js9.0000000000003927
Time to reclassify? The prognostic value of radiologic splenic vessel involvement in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The prognostic impact of radiographic splenic vessel involvement in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body and tail remains controversial.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus in accordance with the PRISMA and AMASTAR guidelines. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Time-to-event method was used.
RESULTS
Eight articles involving 1678 patients were analyzed. Patients with radiological splenic artery (SA) invasion had poorer OS than those without [hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-2.29; P = 0.007]. Similarly, radiological splenic vein (SV) involvement was associated with significantly worse OS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.13-2.44; P = 0.010). Subgroup analyses for SA involvement, categorized by "abutment" and "encasement," showed an overall HR of 2.35 (95% CI 1.72-3.19; P < 0.00001), with HRs of 1.77 (95% CI 1.25-2.59; P = 0.001) for abutment and 3.03 (95% CI 2.20-4.17; P < 0.00001) for encasement, indicating a significant difference between subgroups ( P = 0.02). For SV involvement, the overall HR was 2.15 (95% CI 1.49-3.10; P < 0.001), with HRs of 1.66 (95% CI 0.97-2.84; P = 0.07) for abutment and 2.80 (95% CI 1.98-3.96; P < 0.0001) for encasement, showing no significant difference between subgroups ( P = 0.11).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis showed worse survival in patients with splenic vessel infiltration of PDAC. Therefore, SA and SV invasion may serve as indications for neoadjuvant therapy for resectable PDAC.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.