MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.020

Медицинская библиотека · Forensic science international · 2006

Comparison between computed tomography (CT) and autopsy findings in cases of abdominal injury and disease.

Yamazaki Kentaro, Shiotani Seiji, Ohashi Noriyoshi, Doi Mikio, Kikuchi Kazunori, Nagata Chigusa, Honda Katsuya

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report 10 autopsy cases involving fatal pathological changes in abdominal organs, for which findings of computed tomography (CT) on admission or after death were compared with autopsy findings. Two of the cases were death due to natural causes and eight were death due to traffic accidents. From the findings at autopsy, the causes of death were considered to be rupture of an aortic aneurysm in one case, gastrointestinal bleeding due to gastric cancer in one case, retroperitoneal bleeding in two cases, laceration of the liver in three cases, and traumatic rupture of the small intestine in three cases. CT findings revealed ascites or retroperitoneal bleeding in eight cases. However, in the cases of small-intestinal rupture, CT findings on admission revealed no free air. Therefore, ascites on CT should be regarded as a useful indicator of blunt abdominal trauma. Hepatic portal venous gas, known to be a post-mortem change, was significantly evident on post-mortem CT in cases of traumatic liver or intestinal injury, and was also seen in cases where the period between the accident and CT examination was long.

Для цитирования: Yamazaki Kentaro, Shiotani Seiji, Ohashi Noriyoshi, Doi Mikio, Kikuchi Kazunori, Nagata Chigusa, Honda Katsuya. Comparison between computed tomography (CT) and autopsy findings in cases of abdominal injury and disease.. Forensic science international. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.