BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
Language Proficiency and Maternal and Neonatal Adverse Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Melson Valerie, Gorman Benjamin G, Rajput Sanjna, Lu Lauren, VanLith Caitlin J, Branda Megan E, Carranza Leslie, Theiler Regan N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes between women who are English proficient (EP) and those who have limited English proficiency (LEP).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Single US academic medical centre with interpreter services.
POPULATION: All pregnant women with deliveries during the study period.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified EP and LEP individuals (categorised by self-report) who delivered at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, from 2015 to 2019. Overall composite adverse outcomes, as well as maternal and neonatal composite outcomes, were measured with generalised linear models and logistic regression, reporting estimates and 95% CIs. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess associations between language proficiency and outcome measures while controlling for other clinical factors.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite overall, maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.
RESULTS: Among 10 427 EP and 900 LEP participants, the LEP group had a higher incidence of gestational diabetes, unplanned intensive care unit admission, uterine rupture, postpartum haemorrhage with transfusion, neonatal death and 5-min Apgar score less than 7. The composite overall, maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes were more prevalent in the LEP group than the EP group in unadjusted analysis. Of these, the composite adverse outcome remained significant when the model was adjusted (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with LEP had increased incidence of adverse delivery outcomes, even in a setting with universal availability of medical interpreters.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Single US academic medical centre with interpreter services.
POPULATION: All pregnant women with deliveries during the study period.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified EP and LEP individuals (categorised by self-report) who delivered at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, from 2015 to 2019. Overall composite adverse outcomes, as well as maternal and neonatal composite outcomes, were measured with generalised linear models and logistic regression, reporting estimates and 95% CIs. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess associations between language proficiency and outcome measures while controlling for other clinical factors.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite overall, maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.
RESULTS: Among 10 427 EP and 900 LEP participants, the LEP group had a higher incidence of gestational diabetes, unplanned intensive care unit admission, uterine rupture, postpartum haemorrhage with transfusion, neonatal death and 5-min Apgar score less than 7. The composite overall, maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes were more prevalent in the LEP group than the EP group in unadjusted analysis. Of these, the composite adverse outcome remained significant when the model was adjusted (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with LEP had increased incidence of adverse delivery outcomes, even in a setting with universal availability of medical interpreters.