Injury · 2026
Implementation of a thoracolumbar compression fracture remote review protocol safely reduces in-person spine consultations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nie Jiabao, Di Gerolamo Joseph, Truong Nicholas, Grigorian Areg, Nguyen Peter D, Chan Alvin, Finney Nicole, Hashmi Sohaib, Oh Michael, Nahmias Jeffry
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar compression fractures (TLCF) are often managed non-operatively with Thoracic-Lumbar-Sacral Orthosis (TLSO) bracing. This study evaluated the safety of a novel remote review protocol for non-operative TLCF management.
METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed on adult trauma patients with acute TLCF. The PRE cohort (5/2022-4/2023) received formal bedside consultation, while the POST cohort (6/2023-6/2024) underwent remote review by an on-call spine surgery resident. The primary outcome was the incidence of TLCF-related complications.
RESULTS: Of 120 patients, 79 (65.8%) were in the POST cohort. Demographics, injury mechanisms, vitals, and injury severity score were comparable between cohorts (all p > 0.05). Median time to discharge (PRE 28 h vs. POST 26 h, p = 0.61) was similar. No patients developed TLCF-related complications including neurological deficits or TLSO brace-related complications in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a remote review protocol for low-risk acute TLCF appears safe with similar outcomes and time to discharge compared to traditional bedside consultation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed on adult trauma patients with acute TLCF. The PRE cohort (5/2022-4/2023) received formal bedside consultation, while the POST cohort (6/2023-6/2024) underwent remote review by an on-call spine surgery resident. The primary outcome was the incidence of TLCF-related complications.
RESULTS: Of 120 patients, 79 (65.8%) were in the POST cohort. Demographics, injury mechanisms, vitals, and injury severity score were comparable between cohorts (all p > 0.05). Median time to discharge (PRE 28 h vs. POST 26 h, p = 0.61) was similar. No patients developed TLCF-related complications including neurological deficits or TLSO brace-related complications in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a remote review protocol for low-risk acute TLCF appears safe with similar outcomes and time to discharge compared to traditional bedside consultation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.