Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology · 2019
[TWO CASES OF URETHRAL PROLAPSE MISDIAGNOSED AS PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsui Hirotaka, Kato Kumiko, Kawanishi Hideji, Muramatsu Tomoaki, Kato Takashi, Hirabayashi Hiroki, Suzuki Shoji, Hattori Ryohei
Аннотация
We experienced two cases of urethral prolapse misdiagnosed as pelvic organ prolapse. One patient, an 87-year-old woman, was referred to us from a gynecological clinic with a supposed uterine prolapse. The other patient, an 84-year-old woman, was referred to us from the Department of Urology in a general hospital with a supposed recurrence of cystocele following a transvaginal mesh repair. We diagnosed both of them as having a urethral prolapse through pelvic examination and cystoscopy. Both patients were treated uneventfully with the four-quadrant excisional technique. Urethral prolapse is a relatively rare disease and as such, urologists and gynecologists may have little exposure to the symptoms in a clinical setting, resulting to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. We discussed the differential diagnosis of urethral prolapse.