MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol.110.219

Медицинская библиотека · Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology · 2019

[TWO CASES OF URETHRAL PROLAPSE MISDIAGNOSED AS PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE].

Matsui Hirotaka, Kato Kumiko, Kawanishi Hideji, Muramatsu Tomoaki, Kato Takashi, Hirabayashi Hiroki, Suzuki Shoji, Hattori Ryohei

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We experienced two cases of urethral prolapse misdiagnosed as pelvic organ prolapse. One patient, an 87-year-old woman, was referred to us from a gynecological clinic with a supposed uterine prolapse. The other patient, an 84-year-old woman, was referred to us from the Department of Urology in a general hospital with a supposed recurrence of cystocele following a transvaginal mesh repair. We diagnosed both of them as having a urethral prolapse through pelvic examination and cystoscopy. Both patients were treated uneventfully with the four-quadrant excisional technique. Urethral prolapse is a relatively rare disease and as such, urologists and gynecologists may have little exposure to the symptoms in a clinical setting, resulting to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. We discussed the differential diagnosis of urethral prolapse.

Для цитирования: Matsui Hirotaka, Kato Kumiko, Kawanishi Hideji, Muramatsu Tomoaki, Kato Takashi, Hirabayashi Hiroki, Suzuki Shoji, Hattori Ryohei. [TWO CASES OF URETHRAL PROLAPSE MISDIAGNOSED AS PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE].. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology. 2019. DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol.110.219.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.