BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023
Clinical significance of retained products of conception in placenta previa: a retrospective analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kishimoto Naohisa, Miyamoto Morikazu, Imauji Akari, Takada Minori, Nishitani Soko, Tanabe Risa, Ito Tsubasa, Hada Taira, Otsuka Yuka, Takano Masashi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Retained products of conception (RPOC) often cause severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) but the clinical significance of RPOC in placenta previa is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of RPOC in women with placenta previa. The primary outcome was to evaluate risk factors of RPOC and the secondary outcome was to consider risk factors of severe PPH.
METHODS: Singleton pregnant women with placenta previa who underwent cesarean section (CS) and placenta removal during the operation at the National Defense Medical College Hospital between January 2004 and December 2021 were identified. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine the frequency and risk factors of RPOC and the association of RPOC with severe PPH in pregnant women with placenta previa.
RESULTS: This study included 335 pregnant women. Among these, 24 (7.2%) pregnant women developed RPOC. Pregnant women with prior CS (Odds Ratio (OR) 5.98; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.35-15.20, p < 0.01), major previa (OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.19-8.32, p < 0.01), and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) (OR 92.7; 95% CI 18.39-467.22, p < 0.01) were more frequent in the RPOC group. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior CS (OR 10.70; 95% CI 3.47-33.00, p < 0.01,) and PAS (OR 140.32; 95% CI 23.84-825.79, p < 0.01) were risk factors for RPOC. In pregnant women who have placenta previa with RPOC or without RPOC, the ratio of severe PPH were 58.3% and 4.5%, respectively (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the occurrence of prior CS (OR 9.23; 95% CI 4.02-21.20, p < 0.01), major previa (OR 11.35; 95% CI 3.35-38.38, p < 0.01), placenta at the anterior wall (OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.40-8.44, p = 0.01), PAS (OR 16.47; 95% CI 4.66-58.26, p < 0.01), and RPOC (OR 29.70; 95% CI 11.23-78.55, p < 0.01) was more in pregnant women with severe PPH. In the multivariate analysis for severe PPH, prior CS (OR 4.71; 95% CI 1.29-17.13, p = 0.02), major previa (OR 7.50; 95% CI 1.98-28.43, p < 0.01), and RPOC (OR 13.26; 95% CI 3.61-48.63, p < 0.01) were identified as risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Prior CS and PAS were identified as risk factors for RPOC in placenta previa and RPOC is closely associated with severe PPH. Therefore, a new strategy for RPOC in placenta previa is needed.
METHODS: Singleton pregnant women with placenta previa who underwent cesarean section (CS) and placenta removal during the operation at the National Defense Medical College Hospital between January 2004 and December 2021 were identified. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine the frequency and risk factors of RPOC and the association of RPOC with severe PPH in pregnant women with placenta previa.
RESULTS: This study included 335 pregnant women. Among these, 24 (7.2%) pregnant women developed RPOC. Pregnant women with prior CS (Odds Ratio (OR) 5.98; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.35-15.20, p < 0.01), major previa (OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.19-8.32, p < 0.01), and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) (OR 92.7; 95% CI 18.39-467.22, p < 0.01) were more frequent in the RPOC group. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior CS (OR 10.70; 95% CI 3.47-33.00, p < 0.01,) and PAS (OR 140.32; 95% CI 23.84-825.79, p < 0.01) were risk factors for RPOC. In pregnant women who have placenta previa with RPOC or without RPOC, the ratio of severe PPH were 58.3% and 4.5%, respectively (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the occurrence of prior CS (OR 9.23; 95% CI 4.02-21.20, p < 0.01), major previa (OR 11.35; 95% CI 3.35-38.38, p < 0.01), placenta at the anterior wall (OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.40-8.44, p = 0.01), PAS (OR 16.47; 95% CI 4.66-58.26, p < 0.01), and RPOC (OR 29.70; 95% CI 11.23-78.55, p < 0.01) was more in pregnant women with severe PPH. In the multivariate analysis for severe PPH, prior CS (OR 4.71; 95% CI 1.29-17.13, p = 0.02), major previa (OR 7.50; 95% CI 1.98-28.43, p < 0.01), and RPOC (OR 13.26; 95% CI 3.61-48.63, p < 0.01) were identified as risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Prior CS and PAS were identified as risk factors for RPOC in placenta previa and RPOC is closely associated with severe PPH. Therefore, a new strategy for RPOC in placenta previa is needed.