DOI 10.1016/j.jaacop.2025.05.001
Suicidal Ideation Among Adolescents With Confirmed Maltreatment: Insights From the 2016-2020 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Among adolescents, maltreatment is an established risk factor for suicidal ideation (SI). This study tests the relationship between different forms of maltreatment and SI encountered in emergency department (ED) settings.
METHOD: We used cross-sectional data from a nationally representative sample of ED visits from 2016 to 2020 that involved adolescents 12 to 17 years of age. We sought to characterize the relationship between forms of maltreatment and SI, to explore the relationship between perpetrator type and SI, and to analyze patterns in SI by maltreatment type.
RESULTS
SI was significantly higher among ED visits with maltreated adolescents (7.05%) relative to ED visits without confirmed maltreatment (2.92%; p < .001). SI was documented most in cases of psychological maltreatment (32.85%), followed by multiple forms of maltreatment (24.72%), neglect (6.73%), physical abuse (6.43%), and sexual abuse (5.20%) (p < .001). SI was associated with payer in cases of neglect (p = .038) and sexual abuse (p < .001), sex in cases of physical abuse (p = .022) and sexual abuse (p = .016), and urban-rural status in cases of physical abuse (p = .044). Perpetrator type was differentially associated with SI (p < .001). A significant trend in SI-related ED visits was found by year (odds ratio = 1.12, p = .003) when adjusting for maltreatment type and demographic characteristics.
CONCLUSION
Study findings present new evidence on the relationship between maltreatment and SI encountered in ED settings. Suicide risk assessment for adolescents with maltreatment histories presenting to the ED is important for supporting the psychological health of this vulnerable population.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.