Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
Treatment of isolated injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament-A 2025 Delphi-based structured expert statement by the ligament injury committee of the German Knee Society.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eberle Christian, Dan Milinkovic Danko, Achtnich Andrea, Best Raymond, Braun Philipp-Johannes, Eggeling Lena, Ellermann Andree, Häner Martin, Herbort Mirco, Höher Jürgen, Imhoff Andreas, Kittl Christoph, Mehl Julian, Mengis Natalie, Müller Peter, Niederer Daniel, Günther Daniel, Petersen Wolf, Pfeiffer Thomas, Scheffler Sven, Schoepp Christian, Stein Thomas, Stoffels Thomas, Stöhr Amelie, Gensior Tobias, Jung Tobias
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The main goal was to perform a modified Delphi process with the Ligament Injuries Committee of the German Knee Society (DKG) to structure and optimize the management of isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries.
METHODS: A structured modified Delphi approach was used to develop an expert statement. Steering group formulated an initial questionnaire and distributed it to 15 experienced knee surgeons (male/female 13/2, mean age 45 ± 5 years) of the working group in Round 1. Thirty-one statements covering five thematic topics were then derived from the responses and comprehensive literature search (Medline, Scopus and Cochrane) using variations of different search terms (literature group). The statements underwent two rating cycles by the working group, using a 5-point Likert scale in Round 2 and as a binary 'agree/disagree' in the final third round. Levels of evidence were assigned to each statement using standardized A-E and GRADE grading systems based on the available data.
RESULTS: High agreement (≥80%) was achieved for 24 of the 31 statements (range, 83%-100%), whereas for 7 agreement was <80% (range 63%-74%). The highest levels of agreement were reached for imaging modalities, treatment of PCL tibial avulsions, and preservation of native PCL fibres in reconstruction techniques, whereas the greatest divergence was observed regarding the role of leg axis and slope analyses and indications for corrective osteotomies, use of augmentation in reconstruction and post-operative rehabilitation protocols. The available level of evidence across studies in the literature was predominantly low to moderate. Of the 31 statements, 17 were graded as expert opinion (E, GRADE: very low), 12 as case series (C; GRADE: low), and only 2 achieved higher levels of evidence (B2, GRADE: moderate).
CONCLUSION: By providing structured treatment protocols, this Delphi-based structured expert statement can support clinicians in day-to-day decision-making and ultimately improve patient care and outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN: Expert survey.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.
METHODS: A structured modified Delphi approach was used to develop an expert statement. Steering group formulated an initial questionnaire and distributed it to 15 experienced knee surgeons (male/female 13/2, mean age 45 ± 5 years) of the working group in Round 1. Thirty-one statements covering five thematic topics were then derived from the responses and comprehensive literature search (Medline, Scopus and Cochrane) using variations of different search terms (literature group). The statements underwent two rating cycles by the working group, using a 5-point Likert scale in Round 2 and as a binary 'agree/disagree' in the final third round. Levels of evidence were assigned to each statement using standardized A-E and GRADE grading systems based on the available data.
RESULTS: High agreement (≥80%) was achieved for 24 of the 31 statements (range, 83%-100%), whereas for 7 agreement was <80% (range 63%-74%). The highest levels of agreement were reached for imaging modalities, treatment of PCL tibial avulsions, and preservation of native PCL fibres in reconstruction techniques, whereas the greatest divergence was observed regarding the role of leg axis and slope analyses and indications for corrective osteotomies, use of augmentation in reconstruction and post-operative rehabilitation protocols. The available level of evidence across studies in the literature was predominantly low to moderate. Of the 31 statements, 17 were graded as expert opinion (E, GRADE: very low), 12 as case series (C; GRADE: low), and only 2 achieved higher levels of evidence (B2, GRADE: moderate).
CONCLUSION: By providing structured treatment protocols, this Delphi-based structured expert statement can support clinicians in day-to-day decision-making and ultimately improve patient care and outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN: Expert survey.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.