MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ju.0000000000005126

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 2026

Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Plus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for High-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Analyses of CREST, POTOMAC, and ALBAN.

Joyce Daniel D, Sharma Vidit, Ratcliff Grace E, Barocas Daniel A, Chang Sam S, Penson David F, Packiam Vignesh T, Kulkarni Girish, Wymer Kevin M, Boorjian Stephen A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Three recent trials evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) + bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for treatment of high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Two of these trials (CREST, POTOMAC) demonstrated that ICI + BCG improved event-free survival compared with BCG alone but resulted in higher rates of treatment-related adverse events. In this article, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ICI + BCG compared with BCG alone. We then created a publicly available cost-effectiveness calculator to facilitate future NMIBC drug value comparisons.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We used a Markov model to compare sansalimab + BCG with induction and maintenance BCG alone for BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC. Efficacy and toxicity probabilities were extracted from the CREST trial. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Analyses were repeated using POTOMAC and ALBAN data.

RESULTS

From a US Medicare payer's perspective, the combination of sasanlimab + BCG resulted in 0.03 additional QALYs (6.12 vs 6.09) at an additional cost of $145,940 relative to BCG alone. Combination therapy was found not to be cost-effective over a lifetime horizon (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio = $6,316,217/QALY). On one-way sensitivity analysis, the combination of sasanlimab + BCG became cost-effective only if the cost of sasanlimab was reduced by > 94% (to $1399/treatment). Similar findings were found from a UK perspective and with data from POTOMAC/ALBAN.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI + BCG is not cost-effective as a combination therapy relative to BCG alone. Further efforts are needed to improve the efficacy/toxicity profile of novel therapies, while continued scrutiny of the health system cost implications of new agents remains warranted.

Для цитирования: Joyce Daniel D, Sharma Vidit, Ratcliff Grace E, Barocas Daniel A, Chang Sam S, Penson David F, Packiam Vignesh T, Kulkarni Girish, Wymer Kevin M, Boorjian Stephen A. Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Plus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for High-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Analyses of CREST, POTOMAC, and ALBAN.. The Journal of urology. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000005126.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.