MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ms9.0000000000005496

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026

PRP therapy for chest-wall radiation ulcer: a case report.

Liu Ke, Zeng Song, Li Xuejiao, Huang Weihong

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Radiation ulcers are common complications resulting from radiotherapy. Traditional treatment methods primarily involve thorough wound debridement, continuous vacuum sealing drainage (VSD), and skin flap surgery; however, these approaches often have limited effectiveness and are prone to recurrence.

METHODS

We report a case of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy for a chest-wall radiation ulcer. A 50-year-old woman underwent radiation therapy to a chest wall scar, which led to persistent, recurrent skin rupture and exudation. Initial treatments, including antibiotics, antihistamines, wound debridement, and dressing changes, produced minimal improvement. The patient declined further interventions, such as extensive flap surgery. Subsequently, we applied PRP gel directly to the wound and administered PRP injections around the affected area.

RESULTS

Following this treatment, the radiation ulcer healed successfully. During subsequent follow-up, no recurrence of the ulcer was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This case demonstrates that the combined use of externally applied PRP gel and periwound PRP injections is a feasible approach for treating radiation ulcers, especially in patients unresponsive to conventional treatments. Future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to verify its long-term efficacy.

Для цитирования: Liu Ke, Zeng Song, Li Xuejiao, Huang Weihong. PRP therapy for chest-wall radiation ulcer: a case report.. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012). 2026. DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000005496.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.