MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jog.15561

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2023

Hysteroscopic resection of retained products of conception combined with uterine artery balloon occlusion: A novel case report.

Takizawa Ayako, Matsushima Takashi, Harigane Eika, Suzuki Shunji, Kawamata Hiroshi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Retained products of conception can cause massive bleeding that can be prevented by uterine artery embolization before resection; however, uterine artery balloon occlusion is less invasive. While scattered reports of its use for postpartum hemorrhage exist, no indications have been described. We report a case of hysteroscopic resection of retained products of conception using uterine artery balloon occlusion instead of uterine artery embolization. A 29-year-old woman, gravida 2 para 0, noted an intrauterine mass after an abortion at 7 weeks' gestation. Follow-up visits showed insufficient lowering of human chorionic gonadotropin levels, necessitating surgical treatment. Considering the patient's desire to conceive, we performed uterine artery balloon occlusion to reduce the risk of perinatal complications associated with uterine artery embolization. The operation was completed without complications. The patient conceived spontaneously and had a live baby 7 months after surgery, thus proving the benefits of uterine artery balloon occlusion before hysteroscopic resection.

Для цитирования: Takizawa Ayako, Matsushima Takashi, Harigane Eika, Suzuki Shunji, Kawamata Hiroshi. Hysteroscopic resection of retained products of conception combined with uterine artery balloon occlusion: A novel case report.. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2023. DOI: 10.1111/jog.15561.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.