Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2026
Chronic Implantation of Planar Microelectrode Arrays as a Brain-Computer Interface: A Technical Note and Operational Workflow.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wagner Arthur, Eisenkolb Viktor M, Utzschmid Alexander, Gempt Jens, Jacob Simon N, Meyer Bernhard
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic implantation of brain-computer interface facilitates stable, high-fidelity neuronal recordings over extended periods of time. Planar microelectrode arrays [Utah arrays (UAs)] are commonly used for intracortical signal acquisition. Here, we describe the surgical workflow for chronic implantation of multiple UAs in 2 patients and report safety and signal-quality outcomes.
METHODS: Two patients (MB, MM) underwent chronic UA implantation within a translational research program. Preoperative planning included magnetic resonance imaging and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping for localization of functional targets. MB presented with aphasia after a left hemisphere media territory stroke 6 years before implantation and received 4 UAs in speech-related areas. MM presented with tetraparesis after a high level spinal cord injury and received 4 UAs in areas related to grasping functionality, totaling 256 intracortical electrodes for each patient.
RESULTS: The duration of the chronic implantation has currently amounted to 41 months for MB and 4 months for MM. Optimal signal quality has been recorded in MB in 3 of 4 UAs and in MM in all UAs. After 15 months, MB suffered from wound breakdown, necessitating surgical debridement and intravenous antibiotic treatment. Unimpaired signal acquisition resumed after the wound had healed, and no further complications from UA implantation were recorded otherwise.
CONCLUSION: Chronic implantation of UAs across distinct cortical areas is safe. A standardized workflow-combining imaging-based functional navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping, intraoperative neuronavigation, and structured postoperative surveillance-supports reliable, long-term intracortical signal acquisition.
METHODS: Two patients (MB, MM) underwent chronic UA implantation within a translational research program. Preoperative planning included magnetic resonance imaging and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping for localization of functional targets. MB presented with aphasia after a left hemisphere media territory stroke 6 years before implantation and received 4 UAs in speech-related areas. MM presented with tetraparesis after a high level spinal cord injury and received 4 UAs in areas related to grasping functionality, totaling 256 intracortical electrodes for each patient.
RESULTS: The duration of the chronic implantation has currently amounted to 41 months for MB and 4 months for MM. Optimal signal quality has been recorded in MB in 3 of 4 UAs and in MM in all UAs. After 15 months, MB suffered from wound breakdown, necessitating surgical debridement and intravenous antibiotic treatment. Unimpaired signal acquisition resumed after the wound had healed, and no further complications from UA implantation were recorded otherwise.
CONCLUSION: Chronic implantation of UAs across distinct cortical areas is safe. A standardized workflow-combining imaging-based functional navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping, intraoperative neuronavigation, and structured postoperative surveillance-supports reliable, long-term intracortical signal acquisition.