Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2009
Video-assisted colonic conduit: a new minimally invasive urinary diversion to patients after pelvic radiotherapy.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tobias-Machado Marcos, Starling Eduardo Simao, Korkes Fernando, da Silva Matheus Neves Ribeiro, Appolonio Paulo Roberto, Wroclawski Eric Roger
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report preliminary results of the first case of video-assisted colonic conduit. A 42-year-old woman had undergone external beam radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and developed a vesicovaginal fistula with small capacity bladder. Intraoperative option for urinary diversion was colonic conduit.
METHODS: A 4 trocar transperitoneal approach was chosen and isolation of both ureters was performed. A 5 cm incision between xiphoid and umbilicus was carried out. A 15 cm colonic segment was isolated with linear stapler maintaining blood supply. Intestinal transit was then reconstructed. Leadbetter ureterointestinal anastomoses were performed with ureteral splints. Drainage, colostomy maturation, and closure of incisions were carried out conventionally.
RESULTS: Operative time was 195 minutes; blood loss was 90 mL; no intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Length of hospital stay was 7 days and time to full recovery 3 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted colonic conduit is feasible and have promising results concerning reduction of surgical morbidity.
METHODS: A 4 trocar transperitoneal approach was chosen and isolation of both ureters was performed. A 5 cm incision between xiphoid and umbilicus was carried out. A 15 cm colonic segment was isolated with linear stapler maintaining blood supply. Intestinal transit was then reconstructed. Leadbetter ureterointestinal anastomoses were performed with ureteral splints. Drainage, colostomy maturation, and closure of incisions were carried out conventionally.
RESULTS: Operative time was 195 minutes; blood loss was 90 mL; no intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Length of hospital stay was 7 days and time to full recovery 3 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted colonic conduit is feasible and have promising results concerning reduction of surgical morbidity.