Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
Research Review: No robust effects of Circle of Security-Parenting (COSP) on parenting, parents, or children - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bakermans-Kranenburg Marian J, Galbally Megan, Hawkins Erinn, van IJzendoorn Marinus H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Circle of Security-Parenting (COSP) is one of the most popular attachment-based preventive support programs for parents and children. More than 50,000 participants from different (para)professional disciplines have been trained in the formal COSP™ protocol.
METHODS: In a preregistered meta-analysis and synthesis of all eight randomized trials (N = 1,094 families), we examined COSP's efficacy on caregivers' parenting (sensitive parent-child interactions, reflective functioning, and parenting attitudes), on parent mental health outcomes (stress, depression, and anxiety), and on child attachment security and behavior problems.
RESULTS: We found an overall nonsignificant effect size of Cohen's d = 0.142 (SE = 0.089; p = .154, 95% Confidence Interval -0.068, 0.353, 95% Prediction Interval -0.444, 0.729), in a homogeneous set of studies. The pooled effect sizes of the parenting, parent, and child domains did not differ from each other or from zero. Cluster-robust inference tests showed converging (nonsignificant) results. The majority of the randomized studies (82%) were identified with some concerns about risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the evidence for COSP efficacy does not keep pace with the uptake of COSP in professional practice and policy.
METHODS: In a preregistered meta-analysis and synthesis of all eight randomized trials (N = 1,094 families), we examined COSP's efficacy on caregivers' parenting (sensitive parent-child interactions, reflective functioning, and parenting attitudes), on parent mental health outcomes (stress, depression, and anxiety), and on child attachment security and behavior problems.
RESULTS: We found an overall nonsignificant effect size of Cohen's d = 0.142 (SE = 0.089; p = .154, 95% Confidence Interval -0.068, 0.353, 95% Prediction Interval -0.444, 0.729), in a homogeneous set of studies. The pooled effect sizes of the parenting, parent, and child domains did not differ from each other or from zero. Cluster-robust inference tests showed converging (nonsignificant) results. The majority of the randomized studies (82%) were identified with some concerns about risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the evidence for COSP efficacy does not keep pace with the uptake of COSP in professional practice and policy.