American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 1994
Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case-control study among births in Washington State.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Critchlow C W, Leet T L, Benedetti T J, Daling J R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to quantify the magnitude of risk associated with conditions resulting in umbilical cord prolapse and adverse infant outcome after cord prolapse.
STUDY DESIGN: This population-based case-control study used birth certificate data from 709 cases and 2407 randomly selected controls. Odds ratios were used as measures of association, with stratification performed to control for confounding.
RESULTS: Case infants were more likely to weigh < 2500 mg (odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 3.7 to 6.2) and to born prematurely (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 3.7). Other risk factors were breech presentation (birth weight-adjusted odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.9) and being a second-born twin (odds ratio 5.0, 95% confidence interval 3.3 to 11.7). Subsequent adverse infant outcomes included an increased risk of mortality (relative risk 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 4.0), with mortality being less likely to occur among cases delivered by cesarean section (relative risk 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previously suspected risk factors and supports clinical management of cord prolapse by cesarean section delivery.
STUDY DESIGN: This population-based case-control study used birth certificate data from 709 cases and 2407 randomly selected controls. Odds ratios were used as measures of association, with stratification performed to control for confounding.
RESULTS: Case infants were more likely to weigh < 2500 mg (odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 3.7 to 6.2) and to born prematurely (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 3.7). Other risk factors were breech presentation (birth weight-adjusted odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.9) and being a second-born twin (odds ratio 5.0, 95% confidence interval 3.3 to 11.7). Subsequent adverse infant outcomes included an increased risk of mortality (relative risk 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 4.0), with mortality being less likely to occur among cases delivered by cesarean section (relative risk 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previously suspected risk factors and supports clinical management of cord prolapse by cesarean section delivery.