Neuro-oncology · 2026
Professional Grief, Burnout and Coping among Neuro-Oncologists: A Cross-Sectional Online Study (PROGRESS).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Detchev Raphael, Scheer Maximilian, Oster Christoph, Kebir Sied, Ippen Franziska Maria, Wandke Svenja, Scholl Isabelle, Rutenkröger Mareike
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Physicians treating patients with malignant central nervous system tumors frequently experience patient deaths, yet the impact of professional grief on burnout has not been examined in neuro-oncology. This study investigated whether acute grief responses following patient deaths (Short-term Bereavement Reactions, SBR) and long-term changes resulting from cumulative loss exposure (Accumulated Global Changes, AGC) are associated with emotional exhaustion (EE) among neuro-oncologists in Germany, and whether resilience moderates these relationships.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included n = 131 physicians working in neuro-oncology in Germany. Validated instruments assessed professional grief, burnout, resilience, self-compassion, psychological distress, and neuroticism. Hierarchical regression tested associations and moderation hypotheses. Cluster analysis identified stress-vulnerability-capacity profiles.
RESULTS: The sample comprised physicians across five neuro-oncological specialties (mean age 45.5, 48.1% female). SBR were significantly associated with higher EE after controlling for self-compassion, neuroticism, and psychological distress (B = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.64, P < 0.001), whereas AGC was not (B = 0.04, P = 0.602). Resilience did not moderate these associations. Self-compassion was independently associated with lower EE (B = -0.33, P = 0.012). Cluster analyses identified three distinct stress-vulnerability profiles: Low-Risk (51.1%), Moderate (35.1%), and High-Risk (13.7%). EE differed substantially across profiles (η² = 0.34), with 72.2% of the High-Risk group exceeding clinical EE thresholds. 40.5% of participants desired supervision that was unavailable.
CONCLUSIONS: SBR, but not AGC, were associated with EE among neuro-oncologists. The High-Risk profile may represent a clinically relevant target for screening. Self-compassion and access to supervision warrant further investigation as potential intervention targets.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included n = 131 physicians working in neuro-oncology in Germany. Validated instruments assessed professional grief, burnout, resilience, self-compassion, psychological distress, and neuroticism. Hierarchical regression tested associations and moderation hypotheses. Cluster analysis identified stress-vulnerability-capacity profiles.
RESULTS: The sample comprised physicians across five neuro-oncological specialties (mean age 45.5, 48.1% female). SBR were significantly associated with higher EE after controlling for self-compassion, neuroticism, and psychological distress (B = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.64, P < 0.001), whereas AGC was not (B = 0.04, P = 0.602). Resilience did not moderate these associations. Self-compassion was independently associated with lower EE (B = -0.33, P = 0.012). Cluster analyses identified three distinct stress-vulnerability profiles: Low-Risk (51.1%), Moderate (35.1%), and High-Risk (13.7%). EE differed substantially across profiles (η² = 0.34), with 72.2% of the High-Risk group exceeding clinical EE thresholds. 40.5% of participants desired supervision that was unavailable.
CONCLUSIONS: SBR, but not AGC, were associated with EE among neuro-oncologists. The High-Risk profile may represent a clinically relevant target for screening. Self-compassion and access to supervision warrant further investigation as potential intervention targets.