MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/lary.27698

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2018

Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after thyroid cancer surgery and intraoperative nerve monitoring.

Mizuno Kayoko, Takeuchi Masato, Kanazawa Yuji, Kitamura Morimasa, Ide Kazuki, Omori Koichi, Kawakami Koji

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to investigate the risk of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) with and without the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) during thyroid cancer surgery.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

This study utilized a nationwide claims database in Japan. Patients who underwent thyroid cancer surgery with and without IONM were included, and postoperative RLNP incidence was compared.

RESULTS

The study included 5,804 patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that use of IONM was not associated with increased RLNP risk (odds ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.67-1.96). There was no significant effect on RLNP prevention when stratified by tumor or nodal classification. Rather, the patients who had T4 or N1b classifications who received IONM had higher incidences of RLNP.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of IONM did not significantly reduce the risk of RLNP. The results for the T4 and N1b populations may be explained by indication bias or unmeasured confounders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:1954-1960, 2019.

Для цитирования: Mizuno Kayoko, Takeuchi Masato, Kanazawa Yuji, Kitamura Morimasa, Ide Kazuki, Omori Koichi, Kawakami Koji. Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after thyroid cancer surgery and intraoperative nerve monitoring.. The Laryngoscope. 2018. DOI: 10.1002/lary.27698.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.