La Revue de medecine interne · 2007
[Frequency of self-reported penicillin allergy in the area of Seine-Saint-Denis (France)].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Branellec A, Thomas M, Fain O, Kettaneh A, Stirnemann J, Letellier E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Penicillin allergy is a well-known notion among the general population. Because it is rarely questioned, many patients carry this label unnecessarily and cannot use this efficient and cheap antibiotic family. In previous studies, 8-10% subjects declare a penicillin allergy. But these data came mainly from studies done in hospitals and we found interesting to evaluate a general non-hospitalised population.
METHODS: We set up a study in ambulatory patients of Seine-Saint-Denis (French geographic area in the north east of Paris). It was a transversal study, on a single day, in March 2005. Hundred general practitioners were randomised in this geographic area. All their patients from that day were included and were asked to complete a simple questionnaire.
RESULTS: Among 1057 patients who participated, 99 (9.4%) declared to be allergic to penicillin. Penicillin A was the most cited antibiotic. The most frequently reported clinical manifestations were skin rash (58.6%) and 13 patients (13.1%) reported some severe signs (coma or emergency hospitalisation) of which 11 were anaphylactic shock; eight patients (8.8%) reported digestive signs less compatible with an allergic mechanism. Asthma and eczema appeared to be significantly reported to penicillin allergy in our population sample.
CONCLUSION: The percentage of self-declared allergy found in this study is similar to previous publications. Among penicillins, Penicillin A is the most frequently involved. This study also shows the importance of meticulously questioning patients as it can correct a false diagnosis of penicillin allergy.
METHODS: We set up a study in ambulatory patients of Seine-Saint-Denis (French geographic area in the north east of Paris). It was a transversal study, on a single day, in March 2005. Hundred general practitioners were randomised in this geographic area. All their patients from that day were included and were asked to complete a simple questionnaire.
RESULTS: Among 1057 patients who participated, 99 (9.4%) declared to be allergic to penicillin. Penicillin A was the most cited antibiotic. The most frequently reported clinical manifestations were skin rash (58.6%) and 13 patients (13.1%) reported some severe signs (coma or emergency hospitalisation) of which 11 were anaphylactic shock; eight patients (8.8%) reported digestive signs less compatible with an allergic mechanism. Asthma and eczema appeared to be significantly reported to penicillin allergy in our population sample.
CONCLUSION: The percentage of self-declared allergy found in this study is similar to previous publications. Among penicillins, Penicillin A is the most frequently involved. This study also shows the importance of meticulously questioning patients as it can correct a false diagnosis of penicillin allergy.