Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2015
Surgical management of abnormally invasive placenta: a retrospective cohort study demonstrating the benefits of a standardized operative approach.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brennan Donal J, Schulze Brittany, Chetty Naven, Crandon Alex, Petersen Scott G, Gardener Glenn, Perrin Lewis
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Abnormally invasive placenta is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a standardized operative approach performed by gynecological oncologists in the surgical management of abnormally invasive placenta.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all cases of morbid placental adherence managed at the Mater Mothers' Hospitals, Brisbane, Australia between January 2000 and June 2013. A standard operative approach involving extensive retro-peritoneal and bladder dissection before delivery of the fetus, was undertaken when a gynecological oncologist was present at the start of the procedure. Main outcome measures were estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, and maternal and neonatal morbidity.
RESULTS: The study includes 98 cases of histologically confirmed abnormally invasive placenta. Median estimated blood loss for the entire cohort was 2150 mL (range 300-11 500 mL). Women were divided into three groups, (1) those who had a gynecological oncologist present at the start of the procedure (group 1; n = 43), (2) those who had a gynecological oncologist called in during the procedure (group 2; n = 23), and (3) those who had no gynecological oncologist involved (group 3; n = 32). Group 2 had a significantly higher blood loss than the other groups (p = 0.001) (median 4400 mL). Transfusion requirements were higher in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1 (p = 0.004). Other maternal and neonatal morbidity was similar across all three groups.
CONCLUSION: This study supports the early presence of a gynecological oncologist at delivery when abnormally invasive placenta is suspected and demonstrates that a "call if needed" approach is not acceptable for these complex cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all cases of morbid placental adherence managed at the Mater Mothers' Hospitals, Brisbane, Australia between January 2000 and June 2013. A standard operative approach involving extensive retro-peritoneal and bladder dissection before delivery of the fetus, was undertaken when a gynecological oncologist was present at the start of the procedure. Main outcome measures were estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, and maternal and neonatal morbidity.
RESULTS: The study includes 98 cases of histologically confirmed abnormally invasive placenta. Median estimated blood loss for the entire cohort was 2150 mL (range 300-11 500 mL). Women were divided into three groups, (1) those who had a gynecological oncologist present at the start of the procedure (group 1; n = 43), (2) those who had a gynecological oncologist called in during the procedure (group 2; n = 23), and (3) those who had no gynecological oncologist involved (group 3; n = 32). Group 2 had a significantly higher blood loss than the other groups (p = 0.001) (median 4400 mL). Transfusion requirements were higher in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1 (p = 0.004). Other maternal and neonatal morbidity was similar across all three groups.
CONCLUSION: This study supports the early presence of a gynecological oncologist at delivery when abnormally invasive placenta is suspected and demonstrates that a "call if needed" approach is not acceptable for these complex cases.