MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000111591

Медицинская библиотека · Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2007

Selective feticide in monoamniotic twin pregnancies by umbilical cord occlusion and transection.

Middeldorp Johanna M, Klumper Frans J C M, Oepkes Dick, Lopriore Enrico, Kanhai Humphrey H H, Vandenbussche Frank P H A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

In monoamniotic twin pregnancies discordant for fetal anomaly, parents may opt for selective feticide. However, the normal co-twin remains at risk of sudden demise from cord entanglement. We report on three cases of successful selective feticide by cord occlusion combined with cord transection.

METHODS

We describe technical details and outcome of three monoamniotic twin pregnancies discordant for fetal anomaly (two cases of anencephaly and one case of congenital heart block) in which cord occlusion was followed by transection of the cord using contact laser.

RESULTS

The fetoscopic cord occlusion and transection using laser was successfully performed at 15, 16 and 19 weeks gestation, respectively. In one case, amniotic fluid leakage occurred after fetoscopy. The surviving co-twins were born at 36, 38 and 36 weeks gestation, respectively; two of the three were born vaginally and they were all healthy.

CONCLUSION

In monoamniotic twins, selective feticide using laser occlusion and transection of the umbilical cord is technically feasible and can lead to near-term vaginal birth of healthy co-twins.

Для цитирования: Middeldorp Johanna M, Klumper Frans J C M, Oepkes Dick, Lopriore Enrico, Kanhai Humphrey H H, Vandenbussche Frank P H A. Selective feticide in monoamniotic twin pregnancies by umbilical cord occlusion and transection.. Fetal diagnosis and therapy. 2007. DOI: 10.1159/000111591.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.