MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.14989/actauroljap_63_3_115

Медицинская библиотека · Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica · 2017

[Metachronous Bilateral Testicular Tumors with Frequently Recurrent Hydrocele : A Case Report].

Nitta Satoshi, Sakka Shotaro, Endo Tsuyoshi, Komine Manabu, Sakata Akiko, Tsutsumi Masakazu, Kawai Koji, Nishiyama Hiroyuki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report a case of metachronous bilateral testicular tumors combined with hydrocele. A 46-year-old male presented with frequently recurrent left hydrocele. His medical history included a stage IIA right testicular tumor,which had been treated with right high orchiectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection 22 years ago. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed hydrocele and a low intensity area in the left testis,and the patient underwent left high orchiectomy. After cytological examination of the hydrocele it was categorized as class V,and after a pathological study it was diagnosed as seminoma and embryonal carcinoma. Since postoperative computed tomography showed lung metastasis,treatment with bleomycin,etoposide,and cisplatin (BEP) was indicated. Three courses of BEP produced a complete response. No recurrent testicular tumor was seen at 3 months after the BEP therapy. A metachronous testicular tumor should be considered in patients with a history of testicular tumors who frequently develop recurrent hydrocele.

Для цитирования: Nitta Satoshi, Sakka Shotaro, Endo Tsuyoshi, Komine Manabu, Sakata Akiko, Tsutsumi Masakazu, Kawai Koji, Nishiyama Hiroyuki. [Metachronous Bilateral Testicular Tumors with Frequently Recurrent Hydrocele : A Case Report].. Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica. 2017. DOI: 10.14989/actauroljap_63_3_115.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.