MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1986.tb01647.x

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical endocrinology · 1986

Discordant responses of prolactinoma to two different dopamine agonists.

Ahmed S R, Shalet S M

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 19-year-old woman presented with headaches, temporal lobe epilepsy and primary amenorrhoea. There was a family history of multiple endocrine adenomatosis. Investigation revealed normal visual fields and acuity, hyperprolactinaemia (48 000 mU/l) and a very large pituitary tumour with extrasellar spread. Treatment with bromocriptine reduced the tumour size and the prolactin level to 2440 mU/l. Six months after the start of therapy, resistance to bromocriptine developed and the prolactin concentration progressively rose to pretreatment levels, despite increasing the dose of bromocriptine to 40 mg/d. At this stage treatment with a second dopamine agonist, pergolide, was effective in reducing the prolactin concentration to normal within four months. Serial CT scans at 1, 6 and 12 months on dopamine agonist therapy showed a progressive decrease in tumour size, which seemed to be maintained even during the period of rising prolactin concentrations due to bromocriptine resistance. This case illustrates that during dopamine agonist therapy a discrepancy may exist in the clinical response as judged by reduction in tumour size and decrease in the circulating prolactin level. Furthermore, in patients with prolactinomas, pergolide may induce a response when resistance to bromocriptine develops.

Для цитирования: Ahmed S R, Shalet S M. Discordant responses of prolactinoma to two different dopamine agonists.. Clinical endocrinology. 1986. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1986.tb01647.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.