m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry · 2026

Artificial intelligence system for identifying dental implants from intraoral radiographs: A diagnostic accuracy study.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Cases-Sánchez Ana, González-Angulo Eva, Flesariu-Onu Alexandra, Fons-Badal Carla, Fernández-Estevan Lucía

Аннотация

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Identifying an implant system from radiographic images is essential for managing prosthetic complications but often relies on a clinician's subjective assessment and incomplete patient records. The increasing number of implant systems worldwide complicates accurate recognition and delays treatment procedures.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a commercially available artificial intelligence software program in identifying different dental implant models from periapical radiographs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational retrospective study was conducted using 720 anonymized periapical radiographs representing 12 implant systems. Each radiograph was uploaded into the MovumStudio implant identification module, and a response was considered correct when the software program identified the implant brand or model as the first option with ≥70% confidence. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to assess accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, the Cohen kappa coefficient, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (α=.05).

RESULTS: The artificial intelligence system correctly identified 589 of 674 valid intraoral radiographs, achieving an overall accuracy of 87.4% (95% confidence interval, 84.9% to 89.9%) and a Cohen kappa value of 0.864, indicating almost perfect agreement. Sensitivity and specificity were ≥90% for most implant systems, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve above 0.90, except for the GMI Frontier system (area under the curve=0.55). The mean response time was 8.42 ±5.96 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS: The MovumStudio implant identification module demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and reliability for recognizing most implant systems from periapical radiographs, offering a rapid, user-independent tool to support clinical decision-making.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты