Annals of vascular surgery · 2017
Neoaortoiliac System Procedure to Treat Infected Aortic Grafts.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Klonaris Chris, Patelis Nikolaos, Katsargyris Athanasios, Athanasiadis Dimitrios, Alexandrou Andreas, Liakakos Theodoros
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this case series is to report the results of our center in the surgical treatment of infected abdominal aortic grafts using the neoaortoiliac system (NAIS) procedure.
METHODS: Four male and 2 female patients underwent an NAIS repair after endovascular (n = 3), open (n = 2), or combined surgery (n = 1) in our center. Mean age was 73 ± 5.2 years. Graft infection was diagnosed by computed tomography angiography (CTA), and only in 2 cases further imaging was necessary. The diagnosis was set at average 6.2 years after the initial procedure.
RESULTS: Four patients underwent a standard pantaloon NAIS procedure, 1 patient with a small aortic diameter received 1 femoral vein as aortoaortic interposition graft, and 1 patient received a unilateral aortoiliac bypass; all patients received autologous femoral veins grafts. Thirty-day mortality was zero, with in-hospital mortality of 1 patient (16.7%). Mean hospital stay was 27 ± 4.9 days, with mean intensive care unit stay of 2.2 days (range: 1-3). During follow-up (mean: 6.17 months, range: 1-24 months), 2 patients presented with thigh wound complications, one of which required surgical revision. One patient was readmitted due to upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding as a side effect of anticoagulation, without the presence of ulcer or other GI pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: In our early experience, NAIS showed to be a demanding procedure for both the patient and the surgical team. It avoids however the disadvantages of extra-anatomic bypass and other methods used to treat aortic graft infection. Larger study groups are necessary to support these findings.
METHODS: Four male and 2 female patients underwent an NAIS repair after endovascular (n = 3), open (n = 2), or combined surgery (n = 1) in our center. Mean age was 73 ± 5.2 years. Graft infection was diagnosed by computed tomography angiography (CTA), and only in 2 cases further imaging was necessary. The diagnosis was set at average 6.2 years after the initial procedure.
RESULTS: Four patients underwent a standard pantaloon NAIS procedure, 1 patient with a small aortic diameter received 1 femoral vein as aortoaortic interposition graft, and 1 patient received a unilateral aortoiliac bypass; all patients received autologous femoral veins grafts. Thirty-day mortality was zero, with in-hospital mortality of 1 patient (16.7%). Mean hospital stay was 27 ± 4.9 days, with mean intensive care unit stay of 2.2 days (range: 1-3). During follow-up (mean: 6.17 months, range: 1-24 months), 2 patients presented with thigh wound complications, one of which required surgical revision. One patient was readmitted due to upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding as a side effect of anticoagulation, without the presence of ulcer or other GI pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: In our early experience, NAIS showed to be a demanding procedure for both the patient and the surgical team. It avoids however the disadvantages of extra-anatomic bypass and other methods used to treat aortic graft infection. Larger study groups are necessary to support these findings.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAorta, AbdominalAortographyBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationComputed Tomography AngiographyDevice RemovalEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFemoral VeinHospital MortalityHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignProsthesis-Related InfectionsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome