MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/jp.2012.96

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2012

Neonatal early-onset sepsis evaluations among well-appearing infants: projected impact of changes in CDC GBS guidelines.

Mukhopadhyay S, Eichenwald E C, Puopolo K M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine (a) the proportion of asymptomatic infants born at ≥35 weeks gestation evaluated for early-onset sepsis (EOS) and exposed to postnatal antibiotics; (b) reasons for and outcomes of the evaluations, and (c) anticipated changes when applying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2010 guidelines to this study population.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of infants born at ≥35 weeks gestation in 2008-2009 in a large maternity center.

RESULT: Out of the 7226 infants that met the study criteria: 1062 (14.7%) were evaluated for EOS and half of those evaluated, received empiric antibiotics. 70.4% of evaluations were performed owing to maternal intrapartum fever, but 23% were prompted by inadequate Group B Streptococcus (GBS) prophylaxis alone. Three cases of blood culture-proven infection were identified.

CONCLUSION

Improved approaches are needed to identify asymptomatic infants who are at risk for EOS to decrease unnecessary evaluations and antibiotic exposure. Transition to the 2010 CDC GBS guidelines may eliminate a quarter of EOS evaluations among these infants.

Для цитирования: Mukhopadhyay S, Eichenwald E C, Puopolo K M. Neonatal early-onset sepsis evaluations among well-appearing infants: projected impact of changes in CDC GBS guidelines.. Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2012. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2012.96.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.