MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.001

Медицинская библиотека · European urology · 2015

Five-year analysis of a multi-institutional prospective clinical trial of delayed intervention and surveillance for small renal masses: the DISSRM registry.

Pierorazio Phillip M, Johnson Michael H, Ball Mark W, Gorin Michael A, Trock Bruce J, Chang Peter, Wagner Andrew A, McKiernan James M, Allaf Mohamad E

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A growing body of retrospective literature is emerging regarding active surveillance (AS) for patients with small renal masses (SRMs). There are limited prospective data evaluating the effectiveness of AS compared to primary intervention (PI).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients who chose AS for management of their SRM.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

From 2009 to 2014, the multi-institutional Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses (DISSRM) registry prospectively enrolled 497 patients with solid renal masses ≤4.0cm who chose PI or AS.

INTERVENTION: AS versus PI.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The registry was designed and powered as a noninferiority study based on historic recurrence rates for PI. Analyses were performed in an intention-to-treat manner. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 497 patients enrolled, 274 (55%) chose PI and 223 (45%) chose AS, of whom 21 (9%) crossed over to delayed intervention. AS patients were older, had worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores, total comorbidities, and cardiovascular comorbidities, had smaller tumors, and more often had multiple and bilateral lesions. OS for PI and AS was 98% and 96% at 2 yr, and 92% and 75% at 5 yr, respectively (log rank, p=0.06). At 5 yr, CSS was 99% and 100% for PI and AS, respectively (p=0.3). AS was not predictive of OS or CSS in regression modeling with relatively short follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In a well-selected cohort with up to 5 yr of prospective follow-up, AS was not inferior to PI.

PATIENT SUMMARY: The current report is among the first prospective analyses of patients electing for active surveillance of a small renal mass. Discussion of active surveillance should become part of the standard discussion for management of small renal masses.

Для цитирования: Pierorazio Phillip M, Johnson Michael H, Ball Mark W, Gorin Michael A, Trock Bruce J, Chang Peter, Wagner Andrew A, McKiernan James M, Allaf Mohamad E. Five-year analysis of a multi-institutional prospective clinical trial of delayed intervention and surveillance for small renal masses: the DISSRM registry.. European urology. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.