Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
Utility of Long Radial Artery Sheaths for Left Heart Catheterization.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roshandel Aarash, Shields Danielle, Abaza Ehab, Razzouk Louai, Rao Sunil V, Junarta Joey
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Increased vessel tortuosity may hinder the success of transradial procedures. Longer thin-walled, hydrophilic sheaths ≥ 75 cm can be placed into the ascending aorta and have the potential to avoid femoral access crossover.
METHODS: We studied consecutive cases of patients undergoing left heart catheterization (LHC) where a 75 cm long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath was used from 1/1/22 to 9/30/24. Patient and procedural characteristics were collected. Procedural data included indication, contrast load, radiation dose, procedural time, procedural complications, and the need to convert to femoral access.
RESULTS: Our study sample included 71 patients (mean age 69, 45% male). Comorbidities included hypertension (82%), hyperlipidemia (76%), and congestive heart failure (30%). Previous coronary artery disease was present in 31% of patients, and 20% of patients had undergone previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Indications for LHC included symptoms of stable ischemic heart disease (21%), abnormal non-invasive ischemic testing (52%), acute coronary syndrome (18%), and pre-operative evaluation for surgery (8%). The reason to switch to the long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath was inability to engage the coronaries due to subclavian/brachiocephalic artery tortuosity (86%) or radial artery spasm (14%). After switching to the long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath, 62/71 (87%) cases successfully engaged the coronaries without converting to femoral access. The mean procedure time was 36 min for diagnostic LHC cases (n = 46) and 72 min for PCI cases (n = 25). No procedural complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that use of the long thin-walled, hydrophilic radial sheaths can avoid femoral access crossover in selected cases.
METHODS: We studied consecutive cases of patients undergoing left heart catheterization (LHC) where a 75 cm long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath was used from 1/1/22 to 9/30/24. Patient and procedural characteristics were collected. Procedural data included indication, contrast load, radiation dose, procedural time, procedural complications, and the need to convert to femoral access.
RESULTS: Our study sample included 71 patients (mean age 69, 45% male). Comorbidities included hypertension (82%), hyperlipidemia (76%), and congestive heart failure (30%). Previous coronary artery disease was present in 31% of patients, and 20% of patients had undergone previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Indications for LHC included symptoms of stable ischemic heart disease (21%), abnormal non-invasive ischemic testing (52%), acute coronary syndrome (18%), and pre-operative evaluation for surgery (8%). The reason to switch to the long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath was inability to engage the coronaries due to subclavian/brachiocephalic artery tortuosity (86%) or radial artery spasm (14%). After switching to the long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath, 62/71 (87%) cases successfully engaged the coronaries without converting to femoral access. The mean procedure time was 36 min for diagnostic LHC cases (n = 46) and 72 min for PCI cases (n = 25). No procedural complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that use of the long thin-walled, hydrophilic radial sheaths can avoid femoral access crossover in selected cases.