Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2019
A Novel Cerclage Insertion: Modified Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cervical Cerclage with Transvaginal Removing (MLTCC-TR).
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Yi-Yi, Duan Hua, Zhang Xiang-Ning, Wang Sha, Gao Lei
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To report on our center's experience of a novel modified approach for laparoscopic cervical cerclage and to evaluate its safety and efficacy preliminarily.
DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study.
SETTING: Single academic institution.
PATIENTS: Pregnant and nonpregnant women who underwent the modified laparoscopic transabdominal cervical cerclage with transvaginal removing (MLTCC-TR) from June 2016 to April 2019. Eligible participants had multiple adverse obstetric histories or the short cervix and were not suitable for a second transvaginal cerclage.
INTERVENTIONS: Preconceptional or postconceptional MLTCC-TR.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 24 participants (including 3 first-trimester singleton pregnant women) underwent the MLTCC-TR, giving birth to 27 infants. Among 21 women who underwent preconceptional cerclage, 26 cases of postoperational pregnancies were noted, and the incidence of term labor was 73.07%, which was significantly higher than that in the precerclage group (p <.001). Their mean gestational age at delivery was 37.21 ± 5.05 weeks. Among 3 cases of postconceptional cerclage, the mean gestational age at cerclage was 10.90 ± 2.61 weeks, and all of them had term delivery. The overall neonatal survival rate was 100% (27/27), of which 81.48% (22/27) were term infants. There were no severe perioperative complications directly related to the insertion of cerclage.
CONCLUSION: Our new approach of MLTCC-TR may be a relatively effective, feasible, and safe treatment for cervical insufficiency. It may be considered as an acceptable alternative to the traditional laparoscopic cervical cerclage with its superiority of transvaginal removing.
DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study.
SETTING: Single academic institution.
PATIENTS: Pregnant and nonpregnant women who underwent the modified laparoscopic transabdominal cervical cerclage with transvaginal removing (MLTCC-TR) from June 2016 to April 2019. Eligible participants had multiple adverse obstetric histories or the short cervix and were not suitable for a second transvaginal cerclage.
INTERVENTIONS: Preconceptional or postconceptional MLTCC-TR.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 24 participants (including 3 first-trimester singleton pregnant women) underwent the MLTCC-TR, giving birth to 27 infants. Among 21 women who underwent preconceptional cerclage, 26 cases of postoperational pregnancies were noted, and the incidence of term labor was 73.07%, which was significantly higher than that in the precerclage group (p <.001). Their mean gestational age at delivery was 37.21 ± 5.05 weeks. Among 3 cases of postconceptional cerclage, the mean gestational age at cerclage was 10.90 ± 2.61 weeks, and all of them had term delivery. The overall neonatal survival rate was 100% (27/27), of which 81.48% (22/27) were term infants. There were no severe perioperative complications directly related to the insertion of cerclage.
CONCLUSION: Our new approach of MLTCC-TR may be a relatively effective, feasible, and safe treatment for cervical insufficiency. It may be considered as an acceptable alternative to the traditional laparoscopic cervical cerclage with its superiority of transvaginal removing.