Strabismus · 2026
Outcomes of anterior nasal transposition in inferior oblique overaction grades +3 and +4: a randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alattier Amira, Hassan Allam Ghada, Elashri Mohammed, Kasem Manal, Ahmed Hafez Mohamed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach for high-grade inferior oblique muscle overaction (IOOA) remains controversial. Both anterior nasal transposition (ANT) and conventional anterior transposition (ATIO) are used to correct this condition. We aimed to compare the efficacy, postoperative stability, and safety of ANT with ATIO for the treatment of high-grade IOOA.
METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial on patients with high-grade (+3 or +4) IOOA who were randomly assigned to either the ANT or ATIO group. Primary outcomes included changes in vertical deviation and postoperative grade of IOOA. Secondary outcomes included V-pattern correction, torsional changes, surgical success at 6 months, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled and equally allocated to the two groups. Both groups were demographically and preoperatively comparable. The ANT group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in postoperative hypertropia compared to the ATIO group that remained stable throughout the follow-up period at 1 week (8.4 ± 3.2 vs. 6.8 ± 2.9Δ, p = .042), 1 month (7.6 ± 3.5 vs. 5.2 ± 2.7Δ, p = .008), 3 months (7.3 ± 3.7 vs. 4.9 ± 2.8Δ, p = .003), and 6 months (7.2 ± 3.8 vs. 4.1 ± 2.9Δ, p = .001). Both procedures were highly effective in correcting IOOA, with no significant difference in the final IOOA grade between the two groups. The complication rates were similar for both procedures with no statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSION: Both ATIO and ANT are effective for the management of high-grade IOOA (grades +3 and +4). However, ANT may provide a greater reduction in postoperative hypertropia without increasing complication rates.
METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial on patients with high-grade (+3 or +4) IOOA who were randomly assigned to either the ANT or ATIO group. Primary outcomes included changes in vertical deviation and postoperative grade of IOOA. Secondary outcomes included V-pattern correction, torsional changes, surgical success at 6 months, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled and equally allocated to the two groups. Both groups were demographically and preoperatively comparable. The ANT group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in postoperative hypertropia compared to the ATIO group that remained stable throughout the follow-up period at 1 week (8.4 ± 3.2 vs. 6.8 ± 2.9Δ, p = .042), 1 month (7.6 ± 3.5 vs. 5.2 ± 2.7Δ, p = .008), 3 months (7.3 ± 3.7 vs. 4.9 ± 2.8Δ, p = .003), and 6 months (7.2 ± 3.8 vs. 4.1 ± 2.9Δ, p = .001). Both procedures were highly effective in correcting IOOA, with no significant difference in the final IOOA grade between the two groups. The complication rates were similar for both procedures with no statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSION: Both ATIO and ANT are effective for the management of high-grade IOOA (grades +3 and +4). However, ANT may provide a greater reduction in postoperative hypertropia without increasing complication rates.