Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · 2014
Occult wooden posterior segment intraocular foreign body.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Desai Ankit, Parihar Rohit, Mathews Joanne, Akduman Levent
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate B-scan and computed tomographic appearance of a wooden intraocular foreign body within the posterior segment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors report a case of a patient with an occult retained foreign body. To identify why the object was elusive, an in vitro study was conducted using computed tomography (CT) and B-scan on five human cadaveric eyes with known foreign bodies implanted into the vitreous cavity.
RESULTS: Posterior segment metal and glass produced comet tail artifacts on B-scan, whereas stone, wood, and plastic produced shadowing artifacts. There was difficulty in identifying wood within the posterior chamber via CT. However, stone and plastic were easily detectable but difficult to identify without Hounsfield units.
CONCLUSION: CT provides quick imaging of suspected posterior segment foreign bodies; however, B-scan ultrasonography may prove more useful than CT in detecting wooden foreign bodies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors report a case of a patient with an occult retained foreign body. To identify why the object was elusive, an in vitro study was conducted using computed tomography (CT) and B-scan on five human cadaveric eyes with known foreign bodies implanted into the vitreous cavity.
RESULTS: Posterior segment metal and glass produced comet tail artifacts on B-scan, whereas stone, wood, and plastic produced shadowing artifacts. There was difficulty in identifying wood within the posterior chamber via CT. However, stone and plastic were easily detectable but difficult to identify without Hounsfield units.
CONCLUSION: CT provides quick imaging of suspected posterior segment foreign bodies; however, B-scan ultrasonography may prove more useful than CT in detecting wooden foreign bodies.