Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
NIV-NAVA versus non-invasive respiratory support in preterm neonates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tomé Milena R, Orlandin Eduardo A de S, Zinher Mariana T, Dias Sofia O, Gonçalves-Ferri Walusa A, De Luca Daniele, Iwashita-Lages Thaís
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical and physiological outcomes of NIV-NAVA in preterm infants compared with other non-invasive respiratory support.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a meta-analysis of RCTs and randomized crossover studies comparing NIV-NAVA to other non-invasive strategies in preterm neonates.
RESULTS: NIV-NAVA was superior to other non-invasive support in maximum EAdi (MD - 0.66 µV; 95% CI - 1.17 to -0.15; p = 0.01), asynchrony index (MD - 49.8%; 95% CI - 63.1 to -36.5; p < 0.01), and peak inspiratory pressure (MD - 2.2 cmH2O; 95% CI - 2.7 to -1.7; p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the incidences of intubation (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.48; p = 0.71), reintubation (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.45-1.16; p = 0.18), or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.37-1.60; p = 0.48).
CONCLUSION: NIV-NAVA was associated with improvements in maximum Edi, asynchrony index, and peak inspiratory pressure relative to other non-invasive respiratory strategies, without significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a meta-analysis of RCTs and randomized crossover studies comparing NIV-NAVA to other non-invasive strategies in preterm neonates.
RESULTS: NIV-NAVA was superior to other non-invasive support in maximum EAdi (MD - 0.66 µV; 95% CI - 1.17 to -0.15; p = 0.01), asynchrony index (MD - 49.8%; 95% CI - 63.1 to -36.5; p < 0.01), and peak inspiratory pressure (MD - 2.2 cmH2O; 95% CI - 2.7 to -1.7; p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the incidences of intubation (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.48; p = 0.71), reintubation (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.45-1.16; p = 0.18), or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.37-1.60; p = 0.48).
CONCLUSION: NIV-NAVA was associated with improvements in maximum Edi, asynchrony index, and peak inspiratory pressure relative to other non-invasive respiratory strategies, without significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups.