MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1542/peds.2023-064045

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatrics · 2024

CPAP Versus NIPPV Postextubation in Preterm Neonates: A Comparative-Effectiveness Study.

Mukerji Amit, Read Brooke, Yang Junmin, Baczynski Michelle, Ng Eugene, Dunn Michael, Ethier Guillaume, Abou Mehrem Ayman, Beltempo Marc, Drolet Christine, da Silva Orlando, Louis Deepak, Lemyre Brigitte, Afifi Jehier, Singh Balpreet, Sherlock Rebecca, Stavel Miroslav, Masse Edith, Kanungo Jaideep, Wong Jonathan, Bodani Jaya, Khurshid Faiza, Lee Kyong-Soon, Augustine Sajit, de Oliveira Caio Barbosa, Makary Hala, Newman Alana, Ojah Cecil, Shah Prakesh S

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been shown to be superior to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) postextubation in preterm neonates. However, studies have not permitted high CPAP pressures or rescue with other modes. We hypothesized that if CPAP pressures >8 cmH2O and rescue with other modes were permitted, CPAP would be noninferior to NIPPV.

METHODS

We conducted a pragmatic, comparative-effectiveness, noninferiority study utilizing network-based real-world data from 22 Canadian NICUs. Centers self-selected CPAP or NIPPV as their standard postextubation mode for preterm neonates <29 weeks' gestation. The primary outcome was failure of the initial mode ≤72 hours. Secondary outcomes included failure ≤7 days, and reintubation ≤72 hours and ≤7 days. Groups were compared using a noninferiority adjusted risk-difference (aRD) margin of 0.05, and margin of no difference.

RESULTS

A total of 843 infants extubated to CPAP and 974 extubated to NIPPV were included. CPAP was not noninferior (and inferior) to NIPPV for failure of the initial mode ≤72 hours (33.0% vs 26.3%; aRD 0.07 [0.03 to 0.12], Pnoninferiority(NI) = .86), and ≤7 days (40.7% vs 35.8%; aRD 0.09 [0.05 to 0.13], PNI = 0.97). However, CPAP was noninferior (and equivalent) to NIPPV for reintubation ≤72 hours (13.2% vs 16.1%; aRD 0.01 [-0.05 to 0.02], PNI < .01), and noninferior (and superior) for reintubation ≤7 days (16.4% vs 22.8%; aRD -0.04 [-0.07 to -0.001], PNI < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

CPAP was not noninferior to NIPPV for failure ≤72 hours postextubation; however, it was noninferior to NIPPV for reintubation ≤72 hours and ≤7 days. This suggests CPAP may be a reasonable initial postextubation mode if alternate rescue strategies are available.

Для цитирования: Mukerji Amit, Read Brooke, Yang Junmin, Baczynski Michelle, Ng Eugene, Dunn Michael, Ethier Guillaume, Abou Mehrem Ayman, Beltempo Marc, Drolet Christine, da Silva Orlando, Louis Deepak, Lemyre Brigitte, Afifi Jehier, Singh Balpreet, Sherlock Rebecca, Stavel Miroslav, Masse Edith, Kanungo Jaideep, Wong Jonathan, Bodani Jaya, Khurshid Faiza, Lee Kyong-Soon, Augustine Sajit, de Oliveira Caio Barbosa, Makary Hala, Newman Alana, Ojah Cecil, Shah Prakesh S. CPAP Versus NIPPV Postextubation in Preterm Neonates: A Comparative-Effectiveness Study.. Pediatrics. 2024. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-064045.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.