MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00586-026-09894-1

Медицинская библиотека · European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026

Thoracolumbar burst fractures: robot-assisted mono-segment fixation with vertebral body grafting versus short-segment fixation - a propensity score-matched cohort study.

Qiao Junjie, Fan Yuyu, Zhao Ruizhao, Lv Xinyao, Fang Xiutong

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare robot-assisted mono-segment pedicle fixation with vertebral body grafting (RMF-VBG) versus conventional short-segment fixation with grafting (SF-VBG) for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, focusing on radiographic maintenance of correction and perioperative efficiency.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study (2018-2022) including adults with single-level AO-A3 fractures (T11-L2), ASIA E, treated within 14 days. One-to-one propensity score matching balanced baseline factors. The primary endpoint was loss of sagittal Cobb angle (SCA) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, postoperative length of stay (postop LOS), pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior vertebral body height ratio (AVBHr), pedicle screw accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins), facet joint violation (FJV), perioperative morbidity and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were matched (76 per group). RMF-VBG achieved significantly shorter operative time (62.38 ± 14.26 vs 89.56 ± 20.36 min), reduced blood loss (82.54 ± 19.69 vs 126.38 ± 28.26 mL), and shorter postop LOS (5.23 ± 1.72 vs 7.16 ± 1.39 days; all p<0.001). SCA and AVBHr trajectories were comparable; SCA loss at 12 months did not differ (mean difference -0.07°, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.16; p = 0.551). The 95% CI for the between-group difference in 12-month SCA loss remained within the ±2.0° MCID, indicating no clinically important difference. Screw placement accuracy (Grade A) was higher with RMF-VBG (98.35% vs 90.13%), and FJV Grade 2 was less frequent (0% vs 3.95%). Overall morbidity and ASD were uncommon and similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

For selected thoracolumbar burst fractures, RMF-VBG maintained sagittal correction within the prespecified MCID compared with SF-VBG, while improving perioperative efficiency and screw-related precision.

Для цитирования: Qiao Junjie, Fan Yuyu, Zhao Ruizhao, Lv Xinyao, Fang Xiutong. Thoracolumbar burst fractures: robot-assisted mono-segment fixation with vertebral body grafting versus short-segment fixation - a propensity score-matched cohort study.. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-026-09894-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.